BLW vs. LQDW
BLW (BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust) is a stock, while LQDW (iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the CBOE LQD BuyWrite Index. Over the past 3 years, BLW returned 9.73%/yr vs 3.48%/yr for LQDW. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BLW vs. LQDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLW achieves a -2.24% return, which is significantly lower than LQDW's 1.20% return.
BLW
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- 6M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -2.24%
- 1Y
- -0.49%
- 3Y*
- 9.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.17%
- 10Y*
- 6.57%
LQDW
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLW vs. LQDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLW BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust | -2.24% | 7.17% | 11.06% | 17.29% | -1.09% |
LQDW iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 1.20% | 9.05% | 2.60% | 3.99% | -6.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLW and LQDW is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2022 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLW vs. LQDW — Risk / Return Rank
BLW
LQDW
BLW vs. LQDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust (BLW) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLW | LQDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.27 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 1.95 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 7.14 | -7.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLW vs. LQDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLW drawdown since its inception was -44.13%, which is greater than LQDW's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLW and LQDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLW | LQDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.13% | -9.20% | -34.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | -2.59% | -8.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.19% | -6.74% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -1.12% | -3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -2.29% | -3.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 0.71% | +3.45% |
Volatility
BLW vs. LQDW - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust (BLW) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) at 0.98%. This indicates that BLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLW | LQDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.70% | 0.98% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | 3.19% | +3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.06% | 3.67% | +4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.32% | 5.45% | +6.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 5.45% | +9.13% |
Dividends
BLW vs. LQDW - Dividend Comparison
BLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.65%, less than LQDW's 12.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLW BlackRock Limited Duration Income Trust | 10.65% | 9.89% | 9.39% | 8.63% | 8.26% | 6.99% | 7.39% | 6.27% | 7.14% | 6.24% | 9.68% | 8.26% |
LQDW iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 12.24% | 16.02% | 15.74% | 19.28% | 8.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLW and LQDW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLW has higher volatility (1.70%) compared to LQDW (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLW dropped -44.13% vs LQDW's -9.20%.
LQDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLW and LQDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer