PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLUC vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLUC vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUC achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.57% return.


BLUC

1D
-1.43%
1M
5.44%
YTD
10.25%
6M
10.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPTM

1D
0.43%
1M
4.45%
YTD
11.57%
6M
11.50%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
22.16%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
15.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUC vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BLUC and SPTM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.97

BLUC vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLUC
SPTM

Technology

40.6%
34.0%

Communication Services

12.5%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
10.3%

Financial Services

9.8%
12.1%

Healthcare

7.7%
8.6%

Industrials

7.3%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.8%

Energy

2.7%
3.7%

Utilities

1.7%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.5%
2.0%

Technology

BLUC
40.6%
SPTM
34.0%

Communication Services

BLUC
12.5%
SPTM
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BLUC
10.7%
SPTM
10.3%

Financial Services

BLUC
9.8%
SPTM
12.1%

Healthcare

BLUC
7.7%
SPTM
8.6%

Industrials

BLUC
7.3%
SPTM
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

BLUC
4.0%
SPTM
4.8%

Energy

BLUC
2.7%
SPTM
3.7%

Utilities

BLUC
1.7%
SPTM
2.3%

Real Estate

BLUC
1.6%
SPTM
2.3%

Basic Materials

BLUC
1.5%
SPTM
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLUC vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLUC

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUC vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLUC vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLUCSPTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.11

0.46

+1.66

Drawdowns

BLUC vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUC drawdown since its inception was -10.69%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUC and SPTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLUCSPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.69%

-54.80%

+44.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-0.25%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-9.05%

+7.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

Volatility

BLUC vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLUCSPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

11.87%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.00%

16.86%

-3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.00%

18.03%

-5.03%

BLUC vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BLUC vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

BLUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than SPTM's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLUC
Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF
0.51%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.03%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BLUC and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BLUC.

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.51% for BLUC.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLUC and 0.03% for SPTM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLUC and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer