BLUC vs. SPTM
BLUC (Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BLUC charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
BLUC vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLUC achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.57% return.
BLUC
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.47%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
BLUC vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF | 10.25% | 14.03% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.57% | 14.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLUC and SPTM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.97 |
BLUC vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLUC
SPTM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BLUC
SPTM
Communication Services
BLUC
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
BLUC
SPTM
Financial Services
BLUC
SPTM
Healthcare
BLUC
SPTM
Industrials
BLUC
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
BLUC
SPTM
Energy
BLUC
SPTM
Utilities
BLUC
SPTM
Real Estate
BLUC
SPTM
Basic Materials
BLUC
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLUC vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
BLUC
SPTM
BLUC vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLUC | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.11 | 0.46 | +1.66 |
Drawdowns
BLUC vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLUC drawdown since its inception was -10.69%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUC and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLUC | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.69% | -54.80% | +44.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.25% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -9.05% | +7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
BLUC vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLUC | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.00% | 11.87% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 16.86% | -3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 18.03% | -5.03% |
BLUC vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLUC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BLUC vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
BLUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than SPTM's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF | 0.51% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, BLUC and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BLUC.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.51% for BLUC.
They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLUC and 0.03% for SPTM.
Find the right allocation for BLUC and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer