PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLUC vs. BLGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLUC vs. BLGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) and Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BLUC having a 10.25% return and BLGR slightly higher at 10.51%.


BLUC

1D
-1.43%
1M
5.44%
YTD
10.25%
6M
10.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLGR

1D
-0.96%
1M
6.35%
YTD
10.51%
6M
10.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUC vs. BLGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLUC
Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF
10.25%14.03%
BLGR
Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF
10.51%16.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUC and BLGR is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.97

BLUC vs. BLGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLUC
BLGR

Technology

40.6%
48.1%

Communication Services

12.5%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
10.7%

Financial Services

9.8%
8.2%

Healthcare

7.7%
6.7%

Industrials

7.3%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
1.8%

Energy

2.7%
0.6%

Utilities

1.7%
0.6%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.7%

Basic Materials

1.5%
0.8%

Technology

BLUC
40.6%
BLGR
48.1%

Communication Services

BLUC
12.5%
BLGR
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BLUC
10.7%
BLGR
10.7%

Financial Services

BLUC
9.8%
BLGR
8.2%

Healthcare

BLUC
7.7%
BLGR
6.7%

Industrials

BLUC
7.3%
BLGR
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

BLUC
4.0%
BLGR
1.8%

Energy

BLUC
2.7%
BLGR
0.6%

Utilities

BLUC
1.7%
BLGR
0.6%

Real Estate

BLUC
1.6%
BLGR
0.7%

Basic Materials

BLUC
1.5%
BLGR
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLUC vs. BLGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) and Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLUC vs. BLGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLUCBLGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.11

1.96

+0.15

Drawdowns

BLUC vs. BLGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUC drawdown since its inception was -10.69%, smaller than the maximum BLGR drawdown of -14.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUC and BLGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLUCBLGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.69%

-14.08%

+3.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-1.23%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-2.43%

+0.91%

Volatility

BLUC vs. BLGR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLUCBLGRDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

15.41%

-2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.00%

15.41%

-2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.00%

15.41%

-2.41%

BLUC vs. BLGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BLGR's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BLUC vs. BLGR - Dividend Comparison

BLUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, more than BLGR's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BLGR
Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF
0.23%0.17%
BLUC
Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF
0.51%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BLUC and BLGR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BLUC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLUC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for BLGR.

BLUC has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.23% for BLGR.

BLUC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BLGR is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLUC and 0.24% for BLGR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLUC and BLGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer