PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLUC vs. BLST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLUC vs. BLST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUC achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly higher than BLST's 0.25% return.


BLUC

1D
-1.43%
1M
5.44%
YTD
10.25%
6M
10.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLST

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUC vs. BLST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLUC
Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF
10.25%14.03%
BLST
Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF
0.25%2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUC and BLST is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.28

BLUC vs. BLST - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLUC
BLST

Technology

40.6%

-

Communication Services

12.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%

-

Financial Services

9.8%
100.0%

Healthcare

7.7%

-

Industrials

7.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.0%

-

Energy

2.7%

-

Utilities

1.7%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%

-

Technology

BLUC
40.6%
BLST

-

Communication Services

BLUC
12.5%
BLST

-

Consumer Cyclical

BLUC
10.7%
BLST

-

Financial Services

BLUC
9.8%
BLST
100.0%

Healthcare

BLUC
7.7%
BLST

-

Industrials

BLUC
7.3%
BLST

-

Consumer Defensive

BLUC
4.0%
BLST

-

Energy

BLUC
2.7%
BLST

-

Utilities

BLUC
1.7%
BLST

-

Real Estate

BLUC
1.6%
BLST

-

Basic Materials

BLUC
1.5%
BLST

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLUC vs. BLST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLUC vs. BLST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLUCBLSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.11

1.51

+0.61

Drawdowns

BLUC vs. BLST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUC drawdown since its inception was -10.69%, which is greater than BLST's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUC and BLST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLUCBLSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.69%

-1.69%

-9.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-0.92%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-0.35%

-1.17%

Volatility

BLUC vs. BLST - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLUCBLSTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

2.21%

+10.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.00%

2.21%

+10.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.00%

2.21%

+10.79%

BLUC vs. BLST - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BLUC and BLST have an expense ratio of 0.23%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BLUC vs. BLST - Dividend Comparison

BLUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than BLST's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BLST
Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF
3.38%2.11%
BLUC
Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF
0.51%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLUC and BLST have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.23% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLUC and BLST have the same expense ratio: 0.23% per year.

BLST has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.51% for BLUC.

BLUC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BLST is Short-Term Bond.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLUC and BLST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer