BLUC vs. BLST
BLUC (Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF) and BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLUC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Bluemonte, while BLST is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Bluemonte. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.23% expense ratio.
Performance
BLUC vs. BLST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLUC achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly higher than BLST's 0.25% return.
BLUC
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLST
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLUC vs. BLST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF | 10.25% | 14.03% |
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF | 0.25% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLUC and BLST is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.28 |
BLUC vs. BLST - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLUC
BLST
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
BLUC
BLST
-
Communication Services
BLUC
BLST
-
Consumer Cyclical
BLUC
BLST
-
Financial Services
BLUC
BLST
Healthcare
BLUC
BLST
-
Industrials
BLUC
BLST
-
Consumer Defensive
BLUC
BLST
-
Energy
BLUC
BLST
-
Utilities
BLUC
BLST
-
Real Estate
BLUC
BLST
-
Basic Materials
BLUC
BLST
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLUC vs. BLST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLUC | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.11 | 1.51 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
BLUC vs. BLST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLUC drawdown since its inception was -10.69%, which is greater than BLST's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUC and BLST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLUC | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.69% | -1.69% | -9.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.92% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -0.35% | -1.17% |
Volatility
BLUC vs. BLST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLUC | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.00% | 2.21% | +10.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 2.21% | +10.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 2.21% | +10.79% |
BLUC vs. BLST - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BLUC and BLST have an expense ratio of 0.23%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BLUC vs. BLST - Dividend Comparison
BLUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than BLST's 3.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF | 3.38% | 2.11% |
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF | 0.51% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLUC and BLST have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.23% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLUC and BLST have the same expense ratio: 0.23% per year.
BLST has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.51% for BLUC.
BLUC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BLST is Short-Term Bond.
Find the right allocation for BLUC and BLST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer