BLSG vs. OOQB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLSG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) and OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLSG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

BLSG vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLSG achieves a -58.79% return, which is significantly lower than OOQB's -18.43% return.

BLSG

• 1D: -15.77%
• 1M: -55.27%
• YTD: -58.79%
• 6M: -73.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OOQB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -18.43%
• 6M: -24.99%
• 1Y: -27.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLSG vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF	-58.79%	-60.00%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	-18.43%	-26.98%

Correlation

The correlation between BLSG and OOQB is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.57

Return for Risk

BLSG vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOQB

OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 4
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLSG vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLSG	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.66	-0.41	-0.25

Drawdowns

BLSG vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLSG drawdown since its inception was -83.67%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLSG and OOQB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLSG	OOQB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.67%	-53.44%	-30.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-53.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-83.52%	-43.69%	-39.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.12%	-23.26%	-36.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	30.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLSG	OOQB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	39.39%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	145.44%	51.57%	+93.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	145.44%	58.12%	+87.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	145.44%	58.12%	+87.32%

BLSG vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BLSG and OOQB have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

BLSG vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

BLSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%.

Position	TTM	2025
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	11.62%	9.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLSG and OOQB in my portfolio?

BLSG and OOQB have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLSG or OOQB?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLSG or OOQB?

BLSG and OOQB have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLSG or OOQB?

OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.00% for BLSG.

What is the main difference between BLSG and OOQB?

BLSG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Volatility Shares.