PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLPAX vs. AADTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLPAX vs. AADTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) and American Funds 2025 Target Date Retirement Fund (AADTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLPAX achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly higher than AADTX's 4.92% return. Over the past 10 years, BLPAX has outperformed AADTX with an annualized return of 9.17%, while AADTX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.86% annualized return.


BLPAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.65%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.21%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
9.17%

AADTX

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.57%
YTD
4.92%
6M
5.62%
1Y
14.22%
3Y*
11.75%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*
7.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLPAX vs. AADTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
7.24%16.64%11.30%13.87%-13.60%13.87%13.16%19.53%-4.59%16.71%
AADTX
American Funds 2025 Target Date Retirement Fund
4.92%14.20%8.97%11.57%-13.04%11.12%13.33%17.35%-3.74%14.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BLPAX and AADTX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.98

The correlation between BLPAX and AADTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLPAX vs. AADTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLPAX
BLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

AADTX
AADTX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AADTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AADTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AADTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
AADTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AADTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLPAX vs. AADTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) and American Funds 2025 Target Date Retirement Fund (AADTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLPAXAADTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

2.39

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

3.46

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

2.75

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.23

12.37

-0.14

BLPAX vs. AADTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the AADTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLPAX and AADTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLPAXAADTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.39

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.71

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.88

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.51

+0.41

Drawdowns

BLPAX vs. AADTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLPAX drawdown since its inception was -23.21%, smaller than the maximum AADTX drawdown of -48.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLPAX and AADTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLPAXAADTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.21%

-48.80%

+25.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-5.30%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.62%

-6.77%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.65%

-19.02%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.21%

-19.24%

-3.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.12%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.92%

-6.15%

+3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.18%

+0.44%

Volatility

BLPAX vs. AADTX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to American Funds 2025 Target Date Retirement Fund (AADTX) at 1.95%. This indicates that BLPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AADTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLPAXAADTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

1.95%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

4.89%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

6.04%

+2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.41%

8.21%

+2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.83%

8.93%

+1.90%

BLPAX vs. AADTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLPAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than AADTX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLPAX vs. AADTX - Dividend Comparison

BLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, less than AADTX's 7.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AADTX
American Funds 2025 Target Date Retirement Fund
7.03%7.38%5.18%3.05%3.96%6.24%3.58%3.68%4.06%2.38%3.12%5.82%
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
5.44%5.83%3.59%2.30%6.01%4.97%2.56%3.83%4.69%3.48%3.66%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BLPAX and AADTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BLPAX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to AADTX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLPAX dropped -23.21% vs AADTX's -48.80%.

AADTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLPAX and AADTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer