BLPAX vs. CGDV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BLPAX (American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both funds - BLPAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past 3 years, BLPAX returned 14.69%/yr vs 25.37%/yr for CGDV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLPAX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.

Performance

BLPAX vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLPAX achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 12.51% return.

BLPAX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 2.65%
• YTD: 7.24%
• 6M: 8.21%
• 1Y: 19.27%
• 3Y*: 14.69%
• 5Y*: 7.57%
• 10Y*: 9.17%

CGDV

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 5.15%
• YTD: 12.51%
• 6M: 13.53%
• 1Y: 32.83%
• 3Y*: 25.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLPAX vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BLPAX American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A	7.24%	16.64%	11.30%	13.87%	-7.03%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	12.51%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BLPAX and CGDV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.92

The correlation between BLPAX and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BLPAX vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLPAX

BLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 60
BLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
BLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 82
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLPAX vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLPAX	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.85	-0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	3.89	-0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.53	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	3.46	-0.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.23	16.41	-4.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLPAX vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLPAX and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLPAX	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.85	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	1.25	-0.34

Drawdowns

BLPAX vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLPAX drawdown since its inception was -23.21%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLPAX and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLPAX	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.21%	-21.82%	-1.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.26%	-9.75%	+2.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.62%	-14.28%	+3.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	0.00%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.92%	-3.62%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	2.06%	-0.44%

Volatility

BLPAX vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) is 2.65%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that BLPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLPAX	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.65%	3.07%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.86%	9.17%	-2.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.52%	11.59%	-3.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.41%	15.49%	-5.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.83%	15.49%	-4.66%

BLPAX vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLPAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLPAX vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

BLPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than CGDV's 1.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLPAX American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A	5.44%	5.83%	3.59%	2.30%	6.01%	4.97%	2.56%	3.83%	4.69%	3.48%	3.66%	3.69%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.16%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLPAX and CGDV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, BLPAX and CGDV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BLPAX or CGDV?

CGDV has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to BLPAX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLPAX dropped -23.21% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.