BLOX vs. FITZ
BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLOX is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Nicholas, while FITZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Nicholas. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLOX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.
Performance
BLOX vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BLOX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -12.07%
- 6M
- -15.20%
- YTD
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- -9.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOX vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | -16.10% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLOX and FITZ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLOX vs. FITZ — Risk / Return Rank
BLOX
FITZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLOX vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLOX | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLOX vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLOX drawdown since its inception was -47.09%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -7.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOX and FITZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLOX | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.09% | -7.37% | -39.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.91% | -3.07% | -28.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.17% | -3.94% | -15.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.41% | — | — |
Volatility
BLOX vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLOX | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.49% | 16.06% | +38.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.55% | 16.06% | +37.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.55% | 16.06% | +37.49% |
BLOX vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLOX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLOX vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison
BLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.13%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 48.13% | 22.69% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLOX and FITZ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.
BLOX has the higher dividend yield at 48.13%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
BLOX is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FITZ is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for BLOX and 0.75% for FITZ.
Find the right allocation for BLOX and FITZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer