BLOX vs. FITZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLOX is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Nicholas, while FITZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Nicholas. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLOX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.

Performance

BLOX vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BLOX

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 14.14%
• 6M: 8.96%
• 1Y: 25.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FITZ

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOX vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF	-2.78%
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	-4.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOX and FITZ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.82

Return for Risk

BLOX vs. FITZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLOX

BLOX Risk / Return Rank: 16
BLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
BLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
BLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
BLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

FITZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOX vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLOX	FITZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.11	—	—

Drawdowns

BLOX vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOX drawdown since its inception was -47.09%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -6.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOX and FITZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLOX	FITZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.09%	-6.62%	-40.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.10%	-5.99%	-15.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.66%	-3.64%	-15.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLOX	FITZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.68%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.17%	17.70%	+36.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.89%	17.70%	+36.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.89%	17.70%	+36.19%

BLOX vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLOX vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison

BLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.47%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF	40.47%	22.69%
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLOX and FITZ in my portfolio?

BLOX and FITZ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLOX or FITZ?

On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLOX or FITZ?

FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLOX or FITZ?

BLOX has the higher dividend yield at 40.47%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.

What is the main difference between BLOX and FITZ?

BLOX is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FITZ is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for BLOX and 0.75% for FITZ.