BLOK vs. TSLR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) and TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLOK is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Amplify, while TSLR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BLOK returned 24.42% vs 19.41% for TSLR. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLOK charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TSLR.

Performance

BLOK vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than TSLR's -27.58% return.

BLOK

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -0.28%
• YTD: 12.57%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 24.42%
• 3Y*: 50.68%
• 5Y*: 11.50%
• 10Y*: —

TSLR

• 1D: 3.62%
• 1M: -19.09%
• YTD: -27.58%
• 6M: -31.37%
• 1Y: 19.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOK vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	12.57%	32.64%	53.12%	42.64%
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF	-27.58%	-25.97%	67.57%	1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOK and TSLR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023	0.49

BLOK vs. TSLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLOK	TSLR
Financial Services	55.3%	-
Technology	31.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	66.6%
Communication Services	5.2%	-
Industrials	1.0%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BLOK vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 20
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 22
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 17

TSLR

TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 16
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 18
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOK vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLOK	TSLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.63	0.22	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	0.94	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.11	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	0.36	+0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.49	0.73	+0.76

BLOK vs. TSLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLOK Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the TSLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLOK and TSLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLOK vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, smaller than the maximum TSLR drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and TSLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLOK	TSLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.33%	-82.80%	+9.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.64%	-54.37%	+18.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.97%	-62.94%	+49.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.03%	-50.31%	+24.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.41%	26.72%	-10.31%

Volatility

BLOK vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) is 13.34%, while GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a volatility of 28.92%. This indicates that BLOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLOK	TSLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.34%	28.92%	-15.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.02%	57.66%	-27.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.18%	89.10%	-49.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.53%	115.61%	-73.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.05%	115.61%	-76.56%

BLOK vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLR's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLOK vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison

BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	0.64%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLOK and TSLR in my portfolio?

BLOK and TSLR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLOK or TSLR?

TSLR has higher volatility (28.92%) compared to BLOK (13.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs TSLR's -82.80%.

Which ETF is better, BLOK or TSLR?

On 1-year performance, BLOK leads with 24.42% vs 19.41% for TSLR. On fees, BLOK is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BLOK has been the lower-risk option at 13.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLOK or TSLR?

Over the 1-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 24.42% return vs 19.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLOK or TSLR?

BLOK is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLOK or TSLR?

BLOK has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.

What is the main difference between BLOK and TSLR?

BLOK is categorized as Blockchain, while TSLR is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BLOK and 1.50% for TSLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.