BLOK vs. TIME

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLOK (Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF) and TIME (Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BLOK returned 30.79% vs 23.44% for TIME. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLOK charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TIME.

Performance

BLOK vs. TIME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than TIME's 9.82% return.

BLOK

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: 7.72%
• YTD: 16.21%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 30.79%
• 3Y*: 51.34%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: —

TIME

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 9.82%
• 6M: 10.85%
• 1Y: 23.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOK vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF	16.21%	32.64%	31.91%
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF	9.82%	10.17%	6.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOK and TIME is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024	0.79

The correlation between BLOK and TIME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

BLOK vs. TIME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLOK	TIME
Financial Services	55.3%	3.2%
Technology	31.8%	38.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	13.8%
Communication Services	5.2%	17.4%
Industrials	1.0%	1.0%
Real Estate	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	10.1%
Energy	-	8.4%
Healthcare	-	0.5%
Utilities	-	5.1%

Return for Risk

BLOK vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 21
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 18

TIME

TIME Risk / Return Rank: 45
TIME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
TIME Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
TIME Omega Ratio Rank: 49
TIME Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
TIME Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOK vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLOK	TIME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	1.78	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	2.40	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.31	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	1.80	-0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.90	6.63	-4.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLOK vs. TIME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLOK Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the TIME Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLOK and TIME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLOK	TIME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	1.78	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.80	-0.32

Drawdowns

BLOK vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than TIME's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and TIME.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLOK	TIME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.33%	-24.26%	-49.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.64%	-13.09%	-22.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.16%	-0.74%	-9.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.08%	-5.60%	-20.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.23%	3.55%	+12.68%

Volatility

BLOK vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) at 3.48%. This indicates that BLOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLOK	TIME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.59%	3.48%	+7.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.55%	10.14%	+18.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.29%	13.27%	+25.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.36%	17.62%	+24.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.97%	17.62%	+21.35%

BLOK vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOK has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLOK vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison

BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than TIME's 9.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF	0.62%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF	9.12%	10.02%	15.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLOK and TIME in my portfolio?

BLOK and TIME have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLOK or TIME?

BLOK has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to TIME (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs TIME's -24.26%.

Which ETF is better, BLOK or TIME?

On 1-year performance, BLOK leads with 30.79% vs 23.44% for TIME. On fees, BLOK is cheaper at 0.71% per year. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLOK or TIME?

Over the 1-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 30.79% return vs 23.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLOK or TIME?

BLOK is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLOK or TIME?

TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.12%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.

What is the main difference between BLOK and TIME?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Clockwise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BLOK and 1.00% for TIME.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TIME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.