BLOK vs. RSBY

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLOK is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Amplify, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BLOK returned 8.03% vs 17.35% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. BLOK charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.

Performance

BLOK vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 18.52% return.

BLOK

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -2.03%
• 6M: 1.60%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 1Y: 8.03%
• 3Y*: 38.93%
• 5Y*: 10.86%
• 10Y*: —

RSBY

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 17.92%
• YTD: 18.52%
• 1Y: 17.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOK vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	10.28%	32.64%	28.93%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	18.52%	-12.98%	-7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOK and RSBY is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024	-0.23

Return for Risk

BLOK vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 13
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 13
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 12

RSBY

RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 51
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOK vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLOK	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	1.50	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	2.18	-1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.26	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	2.15	-1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.42	5.04	-4.62

BLOK vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLOK Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLOK and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLOK vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than RSBY's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and RSBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLOK	RSBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.33%	-23.32%	-50.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.64%	-7.95%	-27.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.74%	-6.45%	-8.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.92%	-13.35%	-12.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.79%	3.39%	+13.40%

Volatility

BLOK vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) has a higher volatility of 10.11% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 3.15%. This indicates that BLOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLOK	RSBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.11%	3.15%	+6.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.18%	8.37%	+20.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.76%	11.41%	+27.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.51%	13.37%	+29.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.98%	13.37%	+25.61%

BLOK vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLOK vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than RSBY's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	0.78%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	1.75%	2.07%	2.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLOK and RSBY in my portfolio?

BLOK and RSBY have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLOK or RSBY?

BLOK has higher volatility (10.11%) compared to RSBY (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, BLOK or RSBY?

On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 17.35% vs 8.03% for BLOK. On fees, BLOK is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLOK or RSBY?

Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 17.35% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLOK or RSBY?

BLOK is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLOK or RSBY?

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.78% for BLOK.

What is the main difference between BLOK and RSBY?

BLOK is categorized as Blockchain, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BLOK and 0.98% for RSBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.