BLES vs. ISMD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLES (Inspire Global Hope ETF) and ISMD (Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLES is a Global Equities fund tracking the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while ISMD is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLES returned 7.38%/yr vs 7.62%/yr for ISMD. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLES charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for ISMD.

Performance

BLES vs. ISMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly lower than ISMD's 21.54% return.

BLES

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 3.04%
• YTD: 11.95%
• 6M: 12.47%
• 1Y: 23.80%
• 3Y*: 16.04%
• 5Y*: 7.38%
• 10Y*: —

ISMD

• 1D: -1.62%
• 1M: 5.36%
• YTD: 21.54%
• 6M: 20.97%
• 1Y: 36.88%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 7.62%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLES vs. ISMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF	11.95%	19.25%	5.59%	16.47%	-16.21%	24.36%	12.22%	28.39%	-13.43%	15.23%
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF	21.54%	4.14%	9.53%	16.74%	-13.44%	29.38%	7.45%	24.62%	-12.63%	8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BLES and ISMD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017	0.80

The correlation between BLES and ISMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

BLES vs. ISMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLES	ISMD
Industrials	16.3%	17.7%
Technology	15.6%	17.3%
Financial Services	10.3%	15.2%
Basic Materials	7.8%	5.2%
Real Estate	6.9%	8.9%
Healthcare	5.8%	9.5%
Energy	5.8%	3.3%
Utilities	5.5%	3.3%
Consumer Cyclical	4.5%	11.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	6.1%
Communication Services	1.0%	2.5%

Return for Risk

BLES vs. ISMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLES

BLES Risk / Return Rank: 57
BLES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BLES Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BLES Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BLES Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
BLES Martin Ratio Rank: 61

ISMD

ISMD Risk / Return Rank: 63
ISMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ISMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ISMD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ISMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ISMD Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLES vs. ISMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLES	ISMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.01	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.82	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.34	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	3.84	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.93	12.04	-1.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLES vs. ISMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLES Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the ISMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLES and ISMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLES	ISMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	2.01	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.37	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.40	+0.14

Drawdowns

BLES vs. ISMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, smaller than the maximum ISMD drawdown of -44.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and ISMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLES	ISMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.35%	-44.60%	+4.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	-9.64%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.46%	-26.64%	+11.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.61%	-26.64%	+0.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-1.62%	+1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.05%	-8.17%	+2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	3.07%	-0.89%

Volatility

BLES vs. ISMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) is 3.61%, while Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that BLES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLES	ISMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	4.95%	-1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.60%	12.52%	-2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.43%	18.56%	-6.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.46%	20.87%	-4.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.94%	23.74%	-4.80%

BLES vs. ISMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLES has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ISMD's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLES vs. ISMD - Dividend Comparison

BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than ISMD's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF	1.77%	1.97%	1.90%	1.80%	1.64%	9.28%	1.61%	2.16%	1.73%	2.01%
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF	0.95%	1.21%	1.24%	1.17%	1.28%	9.35%	0.99%	0.88%	1.35%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLES and ISMD in my portfolio?

BLES and ISMD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLES or ISMD?

ISMD has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to BLES (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLES dropped -40.35% vs ISMD's -44.60%.

Which ETF is better, BLES or ISMD?

On 5-year performance, ISMD leads with 7.62% vs 7.38% for BLES. On fees, ISMD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, BLES has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLES or ISMD?

Over the 5-year period, ISMD has performed better with a 7.62% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLES or ISMD?

ISMD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BLES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLES or ISMD?

BLES has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.95% for ISMD.

What is the main difference between BLES and ISMD?

BLES is categorized as Global Equities, while ISMD is Small Cap Blend Equities. BLES tracks Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while ISMD tracks Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BLES and 0.57% for ISMD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.