BLES vs. IBD
BLES (Inspire Global Hope ETF) and IBD (Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLES is a Global Equities fund tracking the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while IBD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Inspire Corporate Bond Impact Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLES returned 7.38%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for IBD. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLES charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for IBD.
Performance
BLES vs. IBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly higher than IBD's -0.18% return.
BLES
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 6M
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- —
IBD
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.30%
- 10Y*
- —
BLES vs. IBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF | 11.95% | 19.25% | 5.59% | 16.47% | -16.21% | 24.36% | 12.22% | 28.39% | -13.43% | 9.87% |
IBD Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF | -0.18% | 7.70% | 3.58% | 6.00% | -8.94% | -1.89% | 5.15% | 7.97% | -1.18% | 1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLES and IBD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2017 | 0.15 |
The correlation between BLES and IBD shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLES vs. IBD — Risk / Return Rank
BLES
IBD
BLES vs. IBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF (IBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLES | IBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.19 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.15 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.93 | 6.66 | +4.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLES | IBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.10 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.23 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.31 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
BLES vs. IBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, which is greater than IBD's maximum drawdown of -16.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and IBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLES | IBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.35% | -16.30% | -24.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -2.15% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.46% | -4.01% | -11.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.61% | -14.76% | -11.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -1.04% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.05% | -3.36% | -2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 0.69% | +1.49% |
Volatility
BLES vs. IBD - Volatility Comparison
Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF (IBD) at 1.03%. This indicates that BLES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLES | IBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 1.03% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.60% | 2.83% | +6.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.43% | 4.21% | +8.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 5.60% | +10.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 6.70% | +12.24% |
BLES vs. IBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLES has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IBD's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLES vs. IBD - Dividend Comparison
BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than IBD's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.64% | 9.28% | 1.61% | 2.16% | 1.73% | 2.01% |
IBD Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF | 4.25% | 4.17% | 4.18% | 3.39% | 1.75% | 1.36% | 1.63% | 2.47% | 2.06% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLES and IBD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLES has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to IBD (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLES dropped -40.35% vs IBD's -16.30%.
On 5-year performance, BLES leads with 7.38% vs 1.30% for IBD. On fees, IBD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, IBD has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLES has performed better with a 7.38% return vs 1.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BLES.
IBD has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 1.77% for BLES.
BLES is categorized as Global Equities, while IBD is Corporate Bonds. BLES tracks Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while IBD tracks Inspire Corporate Bond Impact Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BLES and 0.49% for IBD.
BLES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLES and IBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer