IBD vs. GABF
IBD (Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Inspire Corporate Bond Impact Equal Weight Index, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. IBD is passively managed, while GABF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBD returned 5.04%/yr vs 18.82%/yr for GABF. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IBD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.
Performance
IBD vs. GABF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBD achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -1.93% return.
IBD
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 1Y
- 2.12%
- 3Y*
- 5.04%
- 5Y*
- 1.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.11%
GABF
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -1.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $95.56K | $89.02K | $204.10K | |
| $2.01M | $1.94M | $1.69M |
IBD vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBD Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF | -0.17% | 7.70% | 3.58% | 6.00% | -1.39% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | -1.93% | 3.60% | 44.38% | 38.92% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBD and GABF is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBD vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank
IBD
GABF
IBD vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF (IBD) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBD | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.97 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | -0.26 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | -0.56 | +4.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBD vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBD drawdown since its inception was -16.30%, smaller than the maximum GABF drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBD and GABF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBD | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.30% | -20.86% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.15% | -17.16% | +15.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.61% | -20.86% | +17.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -6.75% | +5.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -4.97% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 7.90% | -7.13% |
Volatility
IBD vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF (IBD) is 1.52%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that IBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBD | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.52% | 4.51% | -2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.12% | 13.17% | -10.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 17.57% | -13.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.66% | 20.37% | -14.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.68% | 20.37% | -13.69% |
IBD vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBD vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison
IBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than GABF's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 2.00% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBD Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF | 4.27% | 4.17% | 4.18% | 3.39% | 1.75% | 1.36% | 1.63% | 2.47% | 2.06% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBD and GABF have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GABF has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to IBD (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBD dropped -16.30% vs GABF's -20.86%.
On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 18.82% vs 5.04% for IBD. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBD has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 18.82% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IBD.
IBD has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 2.00% for GABF.
IBD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IBD and 0.10% for GABF.
IBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBD and GABF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer