BLES vs. BOAT
BLES (Inspire Global Hope ETF) and BOAT (SonicShares Global Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLES is a Global Equities fund tracking the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while BOAT is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Shipping Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLES returned 8.30%/yr vs 24.02%/yr for BOAT. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BLES charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BOAT.
Performance
BLES vs. BOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly lower than BOAT's 42.13% return.
BLES
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- 6M
- 9.60%
- YTD
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.42%
BOAT
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 8.65%
- 6M
- 25.47%
- YTD
- 42.13%
- 1Y
- 50.36%
- 3Y*
- 26.08%
- 5Y*
- 24.02%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $597.33K | $468.61K | $442.76K | |
| $1.73M | $1.10M | $1.06M |
BLES vs. BOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF | 15.92% | 19.25% | 5.59% | 16.47% | -16.21% | 4.46% |
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF | 42.13% | 22.77% | 5.97% | 24.53% | 6.26% | 21.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLES and BOAT is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021 | 0.50 |
The correlation between BLES and BOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BLES vs. BOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLES
BOAT
Industrials
Technology
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
BLES
BOAT
Technology
BLES
BOAT
-
Financial Services
BLES
BOAT
Basic Materials
BLES
BOAT
-
Real Estate
BLES
BOAT
-
Healthcare
BLES
BOAT
-
Utilities
BLES
BOAT
-
Consumer Cyclical
BLES
BOAT
-
Energy
BLES
BOAT
Consumer Defensive
BLES
BOAT
-
Communication Services
BLES
BOAT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLES vs. BOAT — Risk / Return Rank
BLES
BOAT
BLES vs. BOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLES | BOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.40 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 4.36 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.94 | 12.30 | -1.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLES vs. BOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, which is greater than BOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and BOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLES | BOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.35% | -33.94% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -11.60% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.46% | -33.94% | +18.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.61% | -33.94% | +7.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -2.56% | +2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -9.49% | +3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 4.11% | -1.95% |
Volatility
BLES vs. BOAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) is 3.02%, while SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that BLES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLES | BOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 6.75% | -3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 16.96% | -6.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.77% | 20.71% | -7.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 25.03% | -8.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 25.06% | -6.22% |
BLES vs. BOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLES has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BOAT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLES vs. BOAT - Dividend Comparison
BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than BOAT's 6.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.64% | 9.28% | 1.61% | 2.16% | 1.73% | 2.01% |
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF | 6.47% | 8.08% | 13.89% | 13.65% | 13.57% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLES and BOAT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOAT has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to BLES (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLES dropped -40.35% vs BOAT's -33.94%.
On 5-year performance, BOAT leads with 24.02% vs 8.30% for BLES. On fees, BLES is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BLES has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BOAT has performed better with a 24.02% return vs 8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLES is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BOAT.
BOAT has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 1.77% for BLES.
BLES is categorized as Global Equities, while BOAT is Industrials Equities. BLES tracks Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while BOAT tracks Solactive Global Shipping Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BLES and 0.69% for BOAT.
BOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLES and BOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer