PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLES vs. BOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLES vs. BOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly lower than BOAT's 42.13% return.


BLES

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.72%
6M
9.60%
YTD
15.92%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.42%

BOAT

1D
-1.60%
1M
8.65%
6M
25.47%
YTD
42.13%
1Y
50.36%
3Y*
26.08%
5Y*
24.02%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$597.33K$468.61K$442.76K
$1.73M$1.10M$1.06M

BLES vs. BOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BLES
Inspire Global Hope ETF
15.92%19.25%5.59%16.47%-16.21%4.46%
BOAT
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF
42.13%22.77%5.97%24.53%6.26%21.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BLES and BOAT is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021

0.50

The correlation between BLES and BOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BLES vs. BOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLES
BOAT

Industrials

20.7%
29.2%

Technology

17.3%

-

Financial Services

13.0%
6.6%

Basic Materials

9.1%

-

Real Estate

7.9%

-

Healthcare

7.4%

-

Utilities

7.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%

-

Energy

5.6%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

-

Communication Services

0.9%

-

Industrials

BLES
20.7%
BOAT
29.2%

Technology

BLES
17.3%
BOAT

-

Financial Services

BLES
13.0%
BOAT
6.6%

Basic Materials

BLES
9.1%
BOAT

-

Real Estate

BLES
7.9%
BOAT

-

Healthcare

BLES
7.4%
BOAT

-

Utilities

BLES
7.1%
BOAT

-

Consumer Cyclical

BLES
6.5%
BOAT

-

Energy

BLES
5.6%
BOAT
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

BLES
4.5%
BOAT

-

Communication Services

BLES
0.9%
BOAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLES vs. BOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BLES
BLES Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BLES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLES Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BLES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLES Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BOAT
BOAT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BLES vs. BOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLESBOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

4.36

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.94

12.30

-1.36

BLES vs. BOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLES Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the BOAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLES and BOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLES vs. BOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, which is greater than BOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and BOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLESBOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.35%

-33.94%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-11.60%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.46%

-33.94%

+18.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.61%

-33.94%

+7.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-2.56%

+2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-9.49%

+3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

4.11%

-1.95%

Volatility

BLES vs. BOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) is 3.02%, while SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that BLES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLESBOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

6.75%

-3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

16.96%

-6.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

20.71%

-7.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.42%

25.03%

-8.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

25.06%

-6.22%

BLES vs. BOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLES has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BOAT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLES vs. BOAT - Dividend Comparison

BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than BOAT's 6.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLES
Inspire Global Hope ETF
1.77%1.97%1.90%1.80%1.64%9.28%1.61%2.16%1.73%2.01%
BOAT
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF
6.47%8.08%13.89%13.65%13.57%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLES and BOAT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOAT has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to BLES (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLES dropped -40.35% vs BOAT's -33.94%.

On 5-year performance, BOAT leads with 24.02% vs 8.30% for BLES. On fees, BLES is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BLES has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BOAT has performed better with a 24.02% return vs 8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLES is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BOAT.

BOAT has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 1.77% for BLES.

BLES is categorized as Global Equities, while BOAT is Industrials Equities. BLES tracks Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while BOAT tracks Solactive Global Shipping Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BLES and 0.69% for BOAT.

BOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLES and BOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer