BLCV vs. IGF
Compare and contrast key facts about Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF).
BLCV and IGF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BLCV is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on May 19, 2023. IGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007.
Performance
BLCV vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BLCV vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF | -2.92% | 19.96% | 12.63% | 15.71% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.19% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 3.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLCV achieves a -2.92% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 9.19% return.
BLCV
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -2.92%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 12.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGF
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BLCV vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLCV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BLCV vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
BLCV
IGF
BLCV vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLCV | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 2.10 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 2.77 | -1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.42 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 3.10 | -1.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.76 | 15.62 | -10.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLCV | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 2.10 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.24 | +1.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between BLCV and IGF is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BLCV vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
BLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than IGF's 2.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF | 1.40% | 1.37% | 1.63% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.95% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
Drawdowns
BLCV vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLCV drawdown since its inception was -13.44%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCV and IGF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLCV | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.44% | -58.33% | +44.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | -8.74% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.81% | -3.42% | -4.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.06% | -11.96% | +9.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 1.74% | +1.13% |
Volatility
BLCV vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 4.25%. This indicates that BLCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BLCV | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 4.25% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.73% | 7.33% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.51% | 12.73% | +2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.81% | 13.89% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.81% | 16.81% | -4.00% |