BKT vs. GS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).

BKT is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jan 2, 1990.

Performance

BKT vs. GS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BKT vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BKT BlackRock Income Trust	-1.93%	5.92%	3.33%	7.69%	-21.51%	-0.44%	7.36%	14.91%	-2.59%	2.58%
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.	-3.25%	56.64%	52.03%	15.91%	-7.87%	47.61%	17.45%	40.48%	-33.53%	7.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKT achieves a -1.93% return, which is significantly higher than GS's -3.25% return. Over the past 10 years, BKT has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 1.07%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 20.59% annualized return.

BKT

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -4.51%
• YTD: -1.93%
• 6M: -1.35%
• 1Y: -1.29%
• 3Y*: 3.53%
• 5Y*: -2.33%
• 10Y*: 1.07%

GS

• 1D: 4.75%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: -3.25%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 58.07%
• 3Y*: 40.67%
• 5Y*: 23.83%
• 10Y*: 20.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BKT vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKT

BKT Risk / Return Rank: 4
BKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BKT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BKT Martin Ratio Rank: 5

GS

GS Risk / Return Rank: 87
GS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
GS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
GS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKT vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKT	GS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.16	1.82	-1.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.17	2.35	-2.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.33	-0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	3.04	-3.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.23	9.70	-9.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKT vs. GS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKT Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the GS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKT and GS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKT	GS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16	1.82	-1.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	0.87	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	0.70	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.31	-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between BKT and GS is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BKT vs. GS - Dividend Comparison

BKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.97%, more than GS's 1.83% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKT BlackRock Income Trust	9.97%	9.53%	9.19%	8.69%	8.35%	7.31%	6.80%	6.82%	6.48%	5.15%	5.09%	5.89%
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.	1.83%	1.59%	2.01%	2.72%	2.62%	1.70%	1.90%	1.80%	1.89%	1.14%	1.09%	1.41%

Drawdowns

BKT vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKT drawdown since its inception was -48.86%, smaller than the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKT and GS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKT	GS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.86%	-78.84%	+29.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.89%	-19.42%	+13.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.70%	-32.84%	-2.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.70%	-48.75%	+13.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.16%	-12.85%	-6.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.74%	-22.75%	+8.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	6.08%	-3.38%

Volatility

BKT vs. GS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) is 2.55%, while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a volatility of 9.44%. This indicates that BKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKT	GS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.55%	9.44%	-6.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.60%	21.70%	-17.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.91%	32.11%	-24.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.25%	27.68%	-16.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.70%	29.71%	-20.01%