PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BKT vs. XLKQ.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BKTXLKQ.L
YTD Return4.18%39.95%
1Y Return14.13%45.62%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.69%20.44%
5Y Return (Ann)-1.01%26.70%
10Y Return (Ann)1.90%24.28%
Sharpe Ratio1.472.17
Sortino Ratio2.092.85
Omega Ratio1.271.37
Calmar Ratio0.533.09
Martin Ratio4.679.32
Ulcer Index3.54%4.76%
Daily Std Dev11.23%20.37%
Max Drawdown-35.70%-23.83%
Current Drawdown-21.53%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between BKT and XLKQ.L is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BKT vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BKT achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 39.95% return. Over the past 10 years, BKT has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 1.90%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 24.28% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.92%
18.52%
BKT
XLKQ.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKT vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKT has a 2.06% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.


BKT
BlackRock Income Trust
Expense ratio chart for BKT: current value at 2.06% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.06%
Expense ratio chart for XLKQ.L: current value at 0.14% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.14%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BKT vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) and Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BKT, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.96
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BKT, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BKT, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BKT, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.36
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BKT, currently valued at 2.95, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.95
XLKQ.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 2.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 2.94, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.94
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.39
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 3.21, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.21
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 10.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.75

BKT vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKT Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKT and XLKQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.96
2.26
BKT
XLKQ.L

Dividends

BKT vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

BKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, while XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BKT
BlackRock Income Trust
8.21%8.67%8.26%7.22%6.72%6.74%6.49%5.25%5.18%5.89%6.59%7.16%
XLKQ.L
Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BKT vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKT drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -23.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKT and XLKQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-21.53%
-0.65%
BKT
XLKQ.L

Volatility

BKT vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) is 2.56%, while Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that BKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.56%
5.43%
BKT
XLKQ.L