GS vs. MNST
Compare and contrast key facts about The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GS or MNST.
Key characteristics
GS | MNST | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 22.10% | -6.08% |
1Y Return | 46.40% | -9.59% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 11.53% | 6.03% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 21.78% | 11.22% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 13.75% | 16.70% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.13 | -0.44 |
Daily Std Dev | 21.66% | 21.11% |
Max Drawdown | -78.84% | -96.53% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -11.08% |
Fundamentals
GS | MNST | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $146.63B | $58.13B |
EPS | $25.65 | $1.58 |
PE Ratio | 17.73 | 35.10 |
PEG Ratio | 3.14 | 1.90 |
Revenue (TTM) | $46.73B | $7.34B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $37.53B | $3.17B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $10.30B | $2.14B |
Correlation
The correlation between GS and MNST is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GS vs. MNST - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a 22.10% return, which is significantly higher than MNST's -6.08% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has underperformed MNST with an annualized return of 13.75%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively higher 16.70% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GS vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GS vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison
GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, while MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 2.30% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.16% | 1.16% |
Monster Beverage Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GS vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, smaller than the maximum MNST drawdown of -96.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and MNST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GS vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) is 4.74%, while Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that GS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GS vs. MNST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities