GS vs. MNST
Compare and contrast key facts about The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GS or MNST.
Correlation
The correlation between GS and MNST is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GS vs. MNST - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GS:
1.89
MNST:
-0.36
GS:
2.80
MNST:
-0.33
GS:
1.37
MNST:
0.95
GS:
4.92
MNST:
-0.32
GS:
17.71
MNST:
-0.63
GS:
2.73%
MNST:
13.33%
GS:
25.62%
MNST:
23.44%
GS:
-78.84%
MNST:
-69.17%
GS:
-8.52%
MNST:
-16.35%
Fundamentals
GS:
$180.40B
MNST:
$50.52B
GS:
$34.12
MNST:
$1.56
GS:
16.84
MNST:
33.30
GS:
3.95
MNST:
1.63
GS:
$50.96B
MNST:
$7.41B
GS:
$33.41B
MNST:
$3.98B
GS:
$18.07B
MNST:
$2.02B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a 47.09% return, which is significantly higher than MNST's -11.65% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has outperformed MNST with an annualized return of 13.28%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively lower 10.56% annualized return.
GS
47.09%
-4.24%
22.26%
50.30%
22.35%
13.28%
MNST
-11.65%
-5.27%
4.56%
-6.36%
9.78%
10.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GS vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GS vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison
GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 2.08% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.16% | 1.16% |
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GS vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, which is greater than MNST's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and MNST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GS vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 4.72%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GS vs. MNST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities