PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GS vs. MNST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

GS vs. MNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
29.09%
-0.89%
GS
MNST

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a 56.01% return, which is significantly higher than MNST's -7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has outperformed MNST with an annualized return of 14.27%, while MNST has yielded a comparatively lower 11.23% annualized return.


GS

YTD

56.01%

1M

11.73%

6M

27.77%

1Y

78.89%

5Y (annualized)

24.93%

10Y (annualized)

14.27%

MNST

YTD

-7.82%

1M

-1.75%

6M

-1.86%

1Y

-3.08%

5Y (annualized)

12.68%

10Y (annualized)

11.23%

Fundamentals


GSMNST
Market Cap$189.08B$54.48B
EPS$33.54$1.56
PE Ratio17.6735.91
PEG Ratio4.071.67
Total Revenue (TTM)$69.79B$8.29B
Gross Profit (TTM)$52.24B$3.98B
EBITDA (TTM)$18.43B$2.00B

Key characteristics


GSMNST
Sharpe Ratio3.09-0.16
Sortino Ratio4.27-0.05
Omega Ratio1.570.99
Calmar Ratio4.85-0.14
Martin Ratio31.44-0.28
Ulcer Index2.55%12.83%
Daily Std Dev26.01%23.39%
Max Drawdown-78.84%-69.17%
Current Drawdown-1.96%-12.73%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between GS and MNST is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GS vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GS, currently valued at 3.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.09-0.16
The chart of Sortino ratio for GS, currently valued at 4.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.27-0.05
The chart of Omega ratio for GS, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.570.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for GS, currently valued at 4.85, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.85-0.14
The chart of Martin ratio for GS, currently valued at 31.44, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0031.44-0.28
GS
MNST

The current GS Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the MNST Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GS and MNST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.09
-0.16
GS
MNST

Dividends

GS vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison

GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.91%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%1.16%1.16%
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GS vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, which is greater than MNST's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and MNST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.96%
-12.73%
GS
MNST

Volatility

GS vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 14.16% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 9.35%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.16%
9.35%
GS
MNST

Financials

GS vs. MNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items