BKT vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
BKT is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jan 2, 1990. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
BKT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BKT vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKT BlackRock Income Trust | -1.93% | 5.92% | 3.33% | 7.69% | -21.51% | -0.44% | 7.36% | 14.91% | -2.59% | 2.58% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -10.59% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKT achieves a -1.93% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, BKT has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 1.07%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.83% annualized return.
BKT
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 6M
- -1.35%
- 1Y
- -1.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- -2.33%
- 10Y*
- 1.07%
SCHG
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- -10.59%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BKT vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKT has a 2.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BKT vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
BKT
SCHG
BKT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | 0.75 | -0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | 1.23 | -1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.17 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 1.03 | -1.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 3.54 | -3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 0.75 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.57 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.79 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.79 | -0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between BKT and SCHG is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BKT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
BKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.97%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKT BlackRock Income Trust | 9.97% | 9.53% | 9.19% | 8.69% | 8.35% | 7.31% | 6.80% | 6.82% | 6.48% | 5.15% | 5.09% | 5.89% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
BKT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKT drawdown since its inception was -48.86%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKT and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.86% | -34.59% | -14.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.89% | -16.41% | +10.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.70% | -34.59% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.70% | -34.59% | -1.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.16% | -13.34% | -5.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.74% | -5.22% | -9.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 4.78% | -2.08% |
Volatility
BKT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) is 2.55%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that BKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BKT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 6.67% | -4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.60% | 12.51% | -7.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.91% | 22.43% | -14.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.25% | 22.32% | -11.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.70% | 21.51% | -11.81% |