PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKR vs. GIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BKR vs. GIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baker Hughes Company (BKR) and Global Industrial Company (GIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKR achieves a 39.64% return, which is significantly higher than GIC's 11.00% return.


BKR

1D
-0.54%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
39.64%
6M
35.70%
1Y
64.52%
3Y*
30.72%
5Y*
22.39%
10Y*

GIC

1D
0.38%
1M
10.90%
YTD
11.00%
6M
8.19%
1Y
26.13%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
21.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKR vs. GIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
39.64%13.39%23.11%18.58%25.96%19.03%-15.15%23.01%-30.43%-21.62%
GIC
Global Industrial Company
11.00%22.45%-34.29%69.66%-41.04%18.77%62.74%7.69%-1.33%74.59%

Correlation

The correlation between BKR and GIC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2017

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BKR:

$62.89B

GIC:

$1.22B

EPS

BKR:

$3.14

GIC:

$1.96

PE Ratio

BKR:

20.13

GIC:

16.28

PEG Ratio

BKR:

0.11

GIC:

15.54

PS Ratio

BKR:

2.25

GIC:

0.87

PB Ratio

BKR:

2.85

GIC:

2.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

BKR:

$27.89B

GIC:

$1.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BKR:

$6.57B

GIC:

$500.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

BKR:

$4.20B

GIC:

$106.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKR vs. GIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKR
BKR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

GIC
GIC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKR vs. GIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baker Hughes Company (BKR) and Global Industrial Company (GIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKRGICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.19

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

0.76

+3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.78

1.42

+10.36

BKR vs. GIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKR Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the GIC Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKR and GIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKR vs. GIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKR drawdown since its inception was -75.38%, smaller than the maximum GIC drawdown of -98.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKR and GIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKRGICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.38%

-98.09%

+22.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.86%

-30.04%

+13.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.00%

-53.19%

+25.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.53%

-53.19%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.07%

-25.96%

+16.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.66%

-58.91%

+34.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.64%

16.02%

-10.38%

Volatility

BKR vs. GIC - Volatility Comparison

Baker Hughes Company (BKR) has a higher volatility of 11.29% compared to Global Industrial Company (GIC) at 4.33%. This indicates that BKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKRGICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.29%

4.33%

+6.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.84%

20.62%

+4.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.14%

41.31%

-8.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.09%

39.21%

-4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.20%

46.36%

-6.16%

Dividends

BKR vs. GIC - Dividend Comparison

BKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than GIC's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
1.46%2.02%2.05%2.28%2.47%2.99%3.45%2.81%3.35%56.42%0.00%
GIC
Global Industrial Company
3.39%3.56%4.03%2.06%3.06%4.01%9.92%1.91%39.51%1.05%1.14%

Financials

BKR vs. GIC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Baker Hughes Company and Global Industrial Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
6.59B
350.40M
(BKR) Total Revenue
(GIC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BKR vs. GIC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Baker Hughes Company and Global Industrial Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
22.8%
34.8%
Portfolio components
BKR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baker Hughes Company reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 6.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.

GIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported a gross profit of 121.90M and revenue of 350.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.

BKR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baker Hughes Company reported an operating income of 809.00M and revenue of 6.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.

GIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported an operating income of 20.60M and revenue of 350.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

BKR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baker Hughes Company reported a net income of 930.00M and revenue of 6.59B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.

GIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported a net income of 16.60M and revenue of 350.40M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BKR and GIC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKR has higher volatility (11.29%) compared to GIC (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKR dropped -75.38% vs GIC's -98.09%.

BKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKR and GIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer