BKR vs. SLB
Compare and contrast key facts about Baker Hughes Company (BKR) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BKR or SLB.
Key characteristics
| BKR | SLB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 29.60% | -14.94% |
| 1Y Return | 27.80% | -17.14% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 23.56% | 12.06% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 17.21% | 6.71% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.01 | -0.67 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.62 | -0.82 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.20 | 0.90 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.20 | -0.33 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.55 | -1.23 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.79% | 14.75% |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.33% | 27.15% |
| Max Drawdown | -73.51% | -87.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.11% | -51.24% |
Fundamentals
| BKR | SLB | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $43.21B | $62.60B |
| EPS | $2.23 | $3.11 |
| PE Ratio | 19.58 | 14.25 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.98 | 1.95 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $27.30B | $36.01B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $5.76B | $7.22B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $4.42B | $7.79B |
Correlation
The correlation between BKR and SLB is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BKR vs. SLB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BKR achieves a 29.60% return, which is significantly higher than SLB's -14.94% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BKR vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baker Hughes Company (BKR) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BKR vs. SLB - Dividend Comparison
BKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than SLB's 2.47% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKR Baker Hughes Company | 1.95% | 2.28% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 3.45% | 2.81% | 3.35% | 56.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 2.47% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 1.67% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% | 1.87% | 1.39% |
Drawdowns
BKR vs. SLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKR drawdown since its inception was -73.51%, smaller than the maximum SLB drawdown of -87.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKR and SLB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BKR vs. SLB - Volatility Comparison
Baker Hughes Company (BKR) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to Schlumberger Limited (SLB) at 10.82%. This indicates that BKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BKR vs. SLB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Baker Hughes Company and Schlumberger Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities