BKNG vs. PXH

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

BKNG (Booking Holdings Inc.) is a stock, while PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index. Over the past 10 years, BKNG returned 12.44%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for PXH. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BKNG vs. PXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKNG achieves a -22.63% return, which is significantly lower than PXH's 12.73% return. Over the past 10 years, BKNG has outperformed PXH with an annualized return of 12.44%, while PXH has yielded a comparatively lower 10.91% annualized return.

BKNG

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 6.66%
• YTD: -22.63%
• 6M: -21.85%
• 1Y: -23.87%
• 3Y*: 17.23%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: 12.44%

PXH

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 12.73%
• 6M: 14.41%
• 1Y: 29.04%
• 3Y*: 20.06%
• 5Y*: 8.70%
• 10Y*: 10.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKNG vs. PXH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc.	-22.63%	8.59%	41.31%	76.02%	-16.00%	7.72%	8.45%	19.24%	-0.88%	18.53%
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF	12.73%	31.44%	12.09%	13.93%	-15.18%	8.31%	-1.91%	16.77%	-8.68%	26.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BKNG and PXH is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007	0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between BKNG and PXH has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BKNG vs. PXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKNG

BKNG Risk / Return Rank: 13
BKNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
BKNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
BKNG Omega Ratio Rank: 14
BKNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
BKNG Martin Ratio Rank: 10

PXH

PXH Risk / Return Rank: 64
PXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
PXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
PXH Omega Ratio Rank: 65
PXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
PXH Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKNG vs. PXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKNG	PXH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	1.84	-2.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.93	2.49	-3.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.34	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	2.85	-3.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	10.21	-11.57

BKNG vs. PXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the PXH Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKNG and PXH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKNG vs. PXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKNG drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than PXH's maximum drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKNG and PXH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKNG	PXH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.32%	-63.63%	-35.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.35%	-10.24%	-23.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.35%	-17.72%	-15.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.53%	-29.59%	-9.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.77%	-40.42%	-7.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.50%	-3.27%	-25.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.05%	-16.84%	-30.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.53%	2.85%	+14.68%

Volatility

BKNG vs. PXH - Volatility Comparison

Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) have volatilities of 6.54% and 6.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKNG	PXH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.54%	6.41%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.83%	13.09%	+13.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.94%	15.90%	+16.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.26%	17.87%	+14.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.45%	20.06%	+12.39%

Dividends

BKNG vs. PXH - Dividend Comparison

BKNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than PXH's 3.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc.	0.97%	0.72%	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF	3.49%	4.02%	4.43%	4.84%	5.33%	4.69%	2.79%	3.28%	3.30%	2.74%	1.97%	3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKNG and PXH in my portfolio?

BKNG and PXH have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKNG or PXH?

BKNG has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to PXH (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKNG dropped -99.32% vs PXH's -63.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.