BKMC vs. JHMM
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM).
BKMC and JHMM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BKMC is a passively managed fund by BNY Mellon that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2020. JHMM is a passively managed fund by Manulife that tracks the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2015. Both BKMC and JHMM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BKMC vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BKMC vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.26% | 8.74% | 13.78% | 17.50% | -16.03% | 23.83% | 45.93% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 3.12% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% | -15.30% | 24.54% | 45.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKMC achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than JHMM's 3.12% return.
BKMC
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 16.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- —
JHMM
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 18.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BKMC vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than JHMM's 0.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BKMC vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank
BKMC
JHMM
BKMC vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKMC | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.96 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.46 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.20 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 1.40 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 6.22 | -1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKMC | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.96 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.41 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.59 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMC and JHMM is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BKMC vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison
BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than JHMM's 0.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.04% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.38% | 1.63% | 1.15% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
Drawdowns
BKMC vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, smaller than the maximum JHMM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and JHMM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMC | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.02% | -40.71% | +15.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.15% | -13.57% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.02% | -24.10% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -5.58% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -5.50% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.06% | +0.25% |
Volatility
BKMC vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) at 5.75%. This indicates that BKMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BKMC | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 5.75% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 10.93% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.91% | 19.52% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 18.30% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 19.57% | -0.28% |