BKMC vs. VBK
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK).
BKMC and VBK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BKMC is a passively managed fund by The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2020. VBK is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Small Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both BKMC and VBK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BKMC or VBK.
Correlation
The correlation between BKMC and VBK is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BKMC vs. VBK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BKMC:
1.25
VBK:
1.26
BKMC:
1.75
VBK:
1.77
BKMC:
1.22
VBK:
1.21
BKMC:
2.39
VBK:
0.99
BKMC:
5.40
VBK:
5.93
BKMC:
3.49%
VBK:
3.92%
BKMC:
15.11%
VBK:
18.44%
BKMC:
-25.02%
VBK:
-58.69%
BKMC:
-5.23%
VBK:
-5.55%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BKMC having a 2.47% return and VBK slightly lower at 2.45%.
BKMC
2.47%
-2.39%
6.80%
19.73%
N/A
N/A
VBK
2.45%
-3.40%
9.54%
24.11%
7.49%
9.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BKMC vs. VBK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VBK's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BKMC vs. VBK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BKMC
VBK
BKMC vs. VBK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BKMC vs. VBK - Dividend Comparison
BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than VBK's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.50% | 1.54% | 1.38% | 1.63% | 1.15% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.52% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.36% | 0.44% | 0.57% | 0.79% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.98% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
BKMC vs. VBK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, smaller than the maximum VBK drawdown of -58.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and VBK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BKMC vs. VBK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) is 5.17%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that BKMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.