PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKLC vs. NACP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKLC vs. NACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKLC achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.


BKLC

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.93%
6M
10.81%
1Y
28.05%
3Y*
23.25%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*

NACP

1D
-0.13%
1M
9.92%
YTD
22.18%
6M
20.98%
1Y
43.81%
3Y*
27.18%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKLC vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
10.93%18.06%25.56%30.88%-20.52%27.41%37.38%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
22.18%21.38%23.93%29.69%-23.05%27.62%41.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BKLC and NACP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020

0.94

The correlation between BKLC and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKLC vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKLC
NACP

Technology

38.0%
35.8%

Financial Services

10.9%
10.6%

Communication Services

10.8%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
11.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
9.2%

Industrials

7.8%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
3.6%

Energy

3.3%
5.0%

Utilities

2.5%
3.4%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.3%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.5%

Technology

BKLC
38.0%
NACP
35.8%

Financial Services

BKLC
10.9%
NACP
10.6%

Communication Services

BKLC
10.8%
NACP
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BKLC
9.8%
NACP
11.1%

Healthcare

BKLC
8.3%
NACP
9.2%

Industrials

BKLC
7.8%
NACP
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

BKLC
4.4%
NACP
3.6%

Energy

BKLC
3.3%
NACP
5.0%

Utilities

BKLC
2.5%
NACP
3.4%

Real Estate

BKLC
1.7%
NACP
1.3%

Basic Materials

BKLC
1.6%
NACP
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKLC vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NACP
NACP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKLC vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKLCNACPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.54

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

4.56

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

20.04

-5.89

BKLC vs. NACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the NACP Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKLC and NACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKLCNACPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

3.14

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.92

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.93

+0.19

Drawdowns

BKLC vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKLC drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum NACP drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLC and NACP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKLCNACPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

-30.96%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-9.65%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-19.66%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-27.89%

+1.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.13%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-5.75%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.19%

-0.20%

Volatility

BKLC vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) is 3.00%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that BKLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKLCNACPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

4.44%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

11.13%

-2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

14.02%

-1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

17.47%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

18.70%

-1.26%

BKLC vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKLC has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKLC vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison

BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than NACP's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.01%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%0.00%0.00%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
0.55%0.62%2.96%1.28%3.48%3.06%1.48%1.22%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, BKLC and NACP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NACP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to BKLC (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKLC dropped -26.14% vs NACP's -30.96%.

On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 14.33% for BKLC. On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, BKLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 14.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.

BKLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.

BKLC tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for BKLC and 0.49% for NACP.

NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKLC and NACP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer