FHLC vs. FTEC
FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FHLC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index, while FTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FHLC returned 9.88%/yr vs 25.75%/yr for FTEC. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
FHLC vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHLC achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 28.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FHLC has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 9.88%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 25.75% annualized return.
FHLC
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -1.95%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
FTEC
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 28.31%
- 6M
- 27.06%
- 1Y
- 54.89%
- 3Y*
- 32.23%
- 5Y*
- 20.85%
- 10Y*
- 25.75%
FHLC vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | -1.22% | 15.42% | 2.48% | 2.58% | -5.55% | 20.39% | 18.13% | 21.94% | 4.71% | 23.34% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 28.31% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -29.59% | 30.49% | 45.83% | 48.93% | -0.39% | 36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHLC and FTEC is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FHLC and FTEC has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FHLC vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FHLC
FTEC
Healthcare
-
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
FHLC
FTEC
-
Technology
FHLC
FTEC
Financial Services
FHLC
FTEC
Industrials
FHLC
FTEC
Basic Materials
FHLC
-
FTEC
Communication Services
FHLC
-
FTEC
Consumer Cyclical
FHLC
-
FTEC
Consumer Defensive
FHLC
-
FTEC
-
Energy
FHLC
-
FTEC
Real Estate
FHLC
-
FTEC
-
Utilities
FHLC
-
FTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHLC vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
FHLC
FTEC
FHLC vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FHLC | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.40 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 3.39 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | 10.46 | -6.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FHLC vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHLC drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, smaller than the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLC and FTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHLC | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.76% | -34.95% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -16.26% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.87% | -27.30% | +10.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.73% | -34.95% | +17.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.76% | -34.95% | +6.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -4.17% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -5.57% | +0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 5.26% | -1.07% |
Volatility
FHLC vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) is 4.92%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that FHLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHLC | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 10.69% | -5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 18.25% | -7.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 22.50% | -7.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 25.54% | -10.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 24.87% | -8.02% |
FHLC vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FHLC and FTEC have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FHLC vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than FTEC's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 1.40% | 1.40% | 1.51% | 1.40% | 1.30% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 1.38% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 2.07% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FHLC and FTEC have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTEC has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to FHLC (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLC dropped -28.76% vs FTEC's -34.95%.
On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 25.75% vs 9.88% for FHLC. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, FHLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 25.75% return vs 9.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FHLC and FTEC have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
FHLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.35% for FTEC.
FHLC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while FTEC is Technology Equities. FHLC tracks MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index.
FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHLC and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer