PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKLC vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKLC vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKLC achieves a 8.23% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 3.84% return.


BKLC

1D
-1.40%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
8.23%
6M
7.30%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
21.56%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*

BUFX

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.09%
YTD
3.84%
6M
3.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKLC vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BKLC and BUFX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKLC vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKLC vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKLCBUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.54

BKLC vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKLC vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKLC drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLC and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKLCBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

-2.87%

-23.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-0.59%

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-0.24%

-5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

Volatility

BKLC vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKLCBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

4.05%

+8.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

4.05%

+13.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.47%

4.05%

+13.42%

BKLC vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKLC has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKLC vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.04%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%
BUFX
FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, BKLC and BUFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

BKLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

BKLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for BKLC and 0.96% for BUFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKLC and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer