PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKLC vs. BKGI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BKLC vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKLC vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
-4.58%18.06%25.56%30.88%3.17%
BKGI
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
10.41%37.53%12.35%9.72%8.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKLC achieves a -4.58% return, which is significantly lower than BKGI's 10.41% return.


BKLC

1D
2.97%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
-4.58%
6M
-2.24%
1Y
18.74%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*

BKGI

1D
1.11%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
10.41%
6M
15.93%
1Y
32.81%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKLC vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKLC has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BKLC vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BKGI
BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKLC vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKLCBKGIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

2.25

-1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.53

2.84

-1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.46

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.13

-1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.24

15.90

-8.67

BKLC vs. BKGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the BKGI Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKLC and BKGI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKLCBKGIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

2.25

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

1.66

-0.68

Correlation

The correlation between BKLC and BKGI is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BKLC vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison

BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than BKGI's 2.40% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.11%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%
BKGI
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
2.40%2.65%4.55%4.55%0.53%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BKLC vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKLC drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, which is greater than BKGI's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLC and BKGI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKLCBKGIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

-14.79%

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-10.35%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.40%

-3.76%

-2.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-2.60%

-2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.04%

+0.54%

Volatility

BKLC vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) at 4.74%. This indicates that BKLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKLCBKGIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

4.74%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

7.91%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.48%

14.67%

+3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.18%

14.07%

+3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

14.07%

+3.52%