BKLC vs. ACEP
BKLC (BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF) and ACEP (ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BKLC is passively managed, while ACEP is actively managed. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BKLC charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ACEP.
Performance
BKLC vs. ACEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKLC achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than ACEP's 24.65% return.
BKLC
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 1Y
- 23.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.41%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.33%
ACEP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 15.44%
- YTD
- 24.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $36.53K | $36.84K | $48.24K | |
| $20.93M | $19.93M | $22.38M |
BKLC vs. ACEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 13.29% | 4.87% |
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF | 24.65% | 8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKLC and ACEP is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.78 |
BKLC vs. ACEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BKLC
ACEP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BKLC
ACEP
Financial Services
BKLC
ACEP
Communication Services
BKLC
ACEP
Healthcare
BKLC
ACEP
Consumer Cyclical
BKLC
ACEP
Industrials
BKLC
ACEP
Consumer Defensive
BKLC
ACEP
Energy
BKLC
ACEP
Utilities
BKLC
ACEP
-
Real Estate
BKLC
ACEP
Basic Materials
BKLC
ACEP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKLC vs. ACEP — Risk / Return Rank
BKLC
ACEP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BKLC vs. ACEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKLC | ACEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKLC vs. ACEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKLC drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, which is greater than ACEP's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLC and ACEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKLC | ACEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.14% | -7.06% | -19.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.44% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -1.74% | -3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | — | — |
Volatility
BKLC vs. ACEP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKLC | ACEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.08% | 16.86% | -3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 16.86% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 16.86% | +0.54% |
BKLC vs. ACEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKLC has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ACEP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKLC vs. ACEP - Dividend Comparison
BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than ACEP's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.05% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.64% | 1.10% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKLC and ACEP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACEP.
BKLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.11% for ACEP.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for BKLC and 0.45% for ACEP.
Find the right allocation for BKLC and ACEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer