PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKKT vs. TATT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

BKKT vs. TATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bakkt Holdings, Inc. (BKKT) and Tat Techno (TATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKKT vs. TATT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKKT
Bakkt Holdings, Inc.
-26.69%-59.47%-55.57%87.39%-86.02%-15.58%-8.36%
TATT
Tat Techno
-9.02%73.91%153.00%91.51%-16.00%39.28%-0.17%

Fundamentals

EPS

BKKT:

-$6.02

TATT:

$1.33

PS Ratio

BKKT:

0.01

TATT:

2.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

BKKT:

$3.85B

TATT:

$178.02M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BKKT:

$1.61B

TATT:

$44.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

BKKT:

-$78.33M

TATT:

$23.59M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKKT achieves a -26.69% return, which is significantly lower than TATT's -9.02% return.


BKKT

1D
5.90%
1M
-23.01%
YTD
-26.69%
6M
-78.13%
1Y
-15.11%
3Y*
-44.48%
5Y*
-53.85%
10Y*

TATT

1D
6.86%
1M
-26.62%
YTD
-9.02%
6M
-7.72%
1Y
47.85%
3Y*
87.44%
5Y*
51.27%
10Y*
19.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKKT vs. TATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKKT
BKKT Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BKKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKKT Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BKKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKKT Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

TATT
TATT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TATT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TATT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKKT vs. TATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bakkt Holdings, Inc. (BKKT) and Tat Techno (TATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKKTTATTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.10

0.77

-0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.11

1.33

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.18

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

1.17

-1.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.36

3.69

-4.06

BKKT vs. TATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKKT Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the TATT Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKKT and TATT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKKTTATTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

0.77

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

1.00

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.27

0.08

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between BKKT and TATT is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BKKT vs. TATT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BKKT nor TATT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BKKT
Bakkt Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TATT
Tat Techno
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.24%3.88%

Drawdowns

BKKT vs. TATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKKT drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, roughly equal to the maximum TATT drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKKT and TATT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKKTTATTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.41%

-97.07%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.57%

-37.78%

-46.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.41%

-38.93%

-60.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.31%

-33.51%

-65.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.30%

-66.21%

-18.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.83%

11.93%

+40.90%

Volatility

BKKT vs. TATT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bakkt Holdings, Inc. (BKKT) is 19.91%, while Tat Techno (TATT) has a volatility of 28.89%. This indicates that BKKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKKTTATTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.91%

28.89%

-8.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

98.52%

43.65%

+54.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

157.29%

62.91%

+94.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

188.83%

51.45%

+137.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

185.26%

48.60%

+136.66%

Financials

BKKT vs. TATT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bakkt Holdings, Inc. and Tat Techno. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
402.21M
46.53M
(BKKT) Total Revenue
(TATT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BKKT vs. TATT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bakkt Holdings, Inc. and Tat Techno over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
-4.0%
25.2%
Portfolio components
BKKT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bakkt Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of -16.23M and revenue of 402.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -4.0%.

TATT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tat Techno reported a gross profit of 11.72M and revenue of 46.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.

BKKT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bakkt Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -25.26M and revenue of 402.21M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.3%.

TATT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tat Techno reported an operating income of 4.54M and revenue of 46.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

BKKT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bakkt Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -14.92M and revenue of 402.21M, resulting in a net margin of -3.7%.

TATT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tat Techno reported a net income of 4.73M and revenue of 46.53M, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.