PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKKT vs. TATT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BKKT vs. TATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bakkt Holdings, Inc. (BKKT) and Tat Techno (TATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKKT achieves a -11.16% return, which is significantly lower than TATT's -4.12% return.


BKKT

1D
-8.98%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
-11.16%
6M
-39.20%
1Y
-33.13%
3Y*
-37.48%
5Y*
-48.91%
10Y*

TATT

1D
6.10%
1M
22.48%
YTD
-4.12%
6M
6.49%
1Y
60.71%
3Y*
86.27%
5Y*
49.10%
10Y*
20.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKKT vs. TATT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKKT
Bakkt Holdings, Inc.
-11.16%-59.47%-55.57%87.39%-86.02%-15.58%-8.36%
TATT
Tat Techno
-4.12%73.91%153.00%91.51%-16.00%39.28%-0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BKKT and TATT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2020

0.16

The correlation between BKKT and TATT shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (5 years) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BKKT:

-$18.68

TATT:

$1.29

PS Ratio

BKKT:

0.05

TATT:

3.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

BKKT:

$1.28B

TATT:

$177.02M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BKKT:

$470.36M

TATT:

$44.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

BKKT:

-$124.76M

TATT:

$22.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKKT vs. TATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKKT
BKKT Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BKKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKKT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BKKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKKT Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TATT
TATT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TATT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TATT Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKKT vs. TATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bakkt Holdings, Inc. (BKKT) and Tat Techno (TATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKKTTATTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.21

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

1.28

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.53

3.41

-3.95

BKKT vs. TATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKKT Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the TATT Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKKT and TATT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKKTTATTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

0.99

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

0.93

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.25

0.08

-0.34

Drawdowns

BKKT vs. TATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKKT drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, roughly equal to the maximum TATT drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKKT and TATT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKKTTATTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.41%

-97.07%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.57%

-47.50%

-37.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.36%

-47.50%

-41.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.41%

-47.50%

-51.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.16%

-29.92%

-69.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.77%

-66.05%

-18.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

62.11%

17.83%

+44.28%

Volatility

BKKT vs. TATT - Volatility Comparison

Bakkt Holdings, Inc. (BKKT) has a higher volatility of 36.58% compared to Tat Techno (TATT) at 25.05%. This indicates that BKKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKKTTATTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.58%

25.05%

+11.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

79.89%

48.04%

+31.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

149.42%

61.66%

+87.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

189.49%

52.89%

+136.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

183.20%

49.52%

+133.68%

Dividends

BKKT vs. TATT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BKKT nor TATT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BKKT
Bakkt Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TATT
Tat Techno
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.24%3.88%

Financials

BKKT vs. TATT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bakkt Holdings, Inc. and Tat Techno. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B202220232024202520260
41.15M
(BKKT) Total Revenue
(TATT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BKKT and TATT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKKT has higher volatility (36.58%) compared to TATT (25.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKKT dropped -99.41% vs TATT's -97.07%.

TATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKKT and TATT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer