BKIE vs. ICOW
BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - BKIE tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index while ICOW tracks the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKIE returned 9.05%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for ICOW. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BKIE charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
BKIE vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKIE achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 17.35% return.
BKIE
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
ICOW
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 17.35%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 39.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- —
BKIE vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 8.46% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 13.75% | 34.17% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 17.35% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 44.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKIE and ICOW is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between BKIE and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
BKIE vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BKIE
ICOW
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
BKIE
ICOW
-
Industrials
BKIE
ICOW
Technology
BKIE
ICOW
Healthcare
BKIE
ICOW
Consumer Cyclical
BKIE
ICOW
Basic Materials
BKIE
ICOW
Consumer Defensive
BKIE
ICOW
Energy
BKIE
ICOW
Communication Services
BKIE
ICOW
Utilities
BKIE
ICOW
-
Real Estate
BKIE
ICOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKIE vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
BKIE
ICOW
BKIE vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKIE | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.50 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 4.91 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.68 | 17.54 | -9.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKIE | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 2.87 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.61 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.55 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
BKIE vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKIE drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKIE and ICOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKIE | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.19% | -43.49% | +15.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -8.02% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.19% | -14.81% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.19% | -28.48% | +0.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -0.64% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -7.59% | +2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.24% | +0.71% |
Volatility
BKIE vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) have volatilities of 4.42% and 4.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKIE | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 4.41% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | 10.59% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 13.73% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 16.64% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 18.47% | -2.13% |
BKIE vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKIE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKIE vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
BKIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than ICOW's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.12% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKIE and ICOW have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKIE has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to ICOW (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKIE dropped -28.19% vs ICOW's -43.49%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.06% vs 9.05% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.
BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.12% for ICOW.
BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKIE and 0.65% for ICOW.
ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKIE and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer