PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKIE vs. DBAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKIE vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKIE achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 17.39% return.


BKIE

1D
1.22%
1M
2.91%
6M
7.75%
YTD
13.51%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.31%

DBAW

1D
1.64%
1M
1.24%
6M
11.43%
YTD
17.39%
1Y
32.53%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
11.17%
ALL TIME*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.38M$6.81M$5.78M
$1.21M$1.79M$1.16M

BKIE vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
13.51%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
17.39%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%28.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BKIE and DBAW is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.88

The correlation between BKIE and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKIE vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKIE
DBAW

Financial Services

26.6%
23.9%

Industrials

17.9%
13.9%

Technology

11.7%
23.5%

Healthcare

9.1%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
7.1%

Basic Materials

6.7%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
5.0%

Energy

5.0%
4.4%

Communication Services

4.1%
4.7%

Utilities

3.5%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.3%

Financial Services

BKIE
26.6%
DBAW
23.9%

Industrials

BKIE
17.9%
DBAW
13.9%

Technology

BKIE
11.7%
DBAW
23.5%

Healthcare

BKIE
9.1%
DBAW
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BKIE
7.2%
DBAW
7.1%

Basic Materials

BKIE
6.7%
DBAW
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

BKIE
6.3%
DBAW
5.0%

Energy

BKIE
5.0%
DBAW
4.4%

Communication Services

BKIE
4.1%
DBAW
4.7%

Utilities

BKIE
3.5%
DBAW
3.0%

Real Estate

BKIE
1.8%
DBAW
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKIE vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKIE vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKIEDBAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

3.63

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

13.32

-4.27

BKIE vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKIE and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKIE vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKIE drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, smaller than the maximum DBAW drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKIE and DBAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKIEDBAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.19%

-31.44%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-9.00%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

-14.11%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.19%

-17.87%

-10.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.65%

+1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-4.97%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.45%

+0.48%

Volatility

BKIE vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) is 4.18%, while Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that BKIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKIEDBAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

4.81%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

12.99%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

14.71%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

14.06%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.32%

15.22%

+1.10%

BKIE vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKIE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKIE vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

BKIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than DBAW's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.10%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
1.67%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKIE and DBAW have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBAW has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to BKIE (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKIE dropped -28.19% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

On 5-year performance, DBAW leads with 11.54% vs 10.01% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 11.54% return vs 10.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 1.67% for DBAW.

BKIE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKIE and 0.41% for DBAW.

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKIE and DBAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer