BKHY vs. PHYD
BKHY (BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF) and PHYD (Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -) are both High Yield Bonds funds. BKHY is passively managed, while PHYD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKHY returned 9.00%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for PHYD. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BKHY charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PHYD.
Performance
BKHY vs. PHYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKHY achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly lower than PHYD's 2.32% return.
BKHY
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 6.55%
- 3Y*
- 9.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- —
PHYD
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 8.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKHY vs. PHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BKHY BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF | 1.96% | 8.48% | 8.37% | 8.60% |
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 2.32% | 8.84% | 7.35% | 8.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKHY and PHYD is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between BKHY and PHYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKHY vs. PHYD — Risk / Return Rank
BKHY
PHYD
BKHY vs. PHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKHY | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.46 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 3.66 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.84 | 14.79 | -2.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKHY vs. PHYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKHY drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, which is greater than PHYD's maximum drawdown of -4.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKHY and PHYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKHY | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.89% | -4.33% | -11.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.53% | -2.10% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.87% | -4.14% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.79% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -0.62% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 0.52% | +0.03% |
Volatility
BKHY vs. PHYD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) is 0.90%, while Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) has a volatility of 1.07%. This indicates that BKHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKHY | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.90% | 1.07% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.03% | 2.57% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 3.36% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.59% | 4.58% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.34% | 4.58% | +2.76% |
BKHY vs. PHYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKHY has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than PHYD's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKHY vs. PHYD - Dividend Comparison
BKHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%, less than PHYD's 8.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKHY BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF | 7.45% | 7.33% | 7.34% | 8.67% | 6.59% | 6.78% | 4.65% |
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 8.52% | 6.63% | 6.80% | 6.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKHY and PHYD have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHYD has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to BKHY (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKHY dropped -15.89% vs PHYD's -4.33%.
On 3-year performance, BKHY leads with 9.00% vs 8.72% for PHYD. On fees, BKHY is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, BKHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BKHY has performed better with a 9.00% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKHY is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PHYD.
PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 8.52%, compared with 7.45% for BKHY.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for BKHY and 0.55% for PHYD.
PHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKHY and PHYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer