BKHY vs. HYDW
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW).
BKHY and HYDW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BKHY is a passively managed fund by The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2020. HYDW is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2018. Both BKHY and HYDW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BKHY or HYDW.
Correlation
The correlation between BKHY and HYDW is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BKHY vs. HYDW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BKHY:
2.41
HYDW:
1.95
BKHY:
3.50
HYDW:
2.85
BKHY:
1.45
HYDW:
1.37
BKHY:
4.81
HYDW:
3.76
BKHY:
17.01
HYDW:
12.05
BKHY:
0.59%
HYDW:
0.59%
BKHY:
4.15%
HYDW:
3.63%
BKHY:
-15.89%
HYDW:
-17.75%
BKHY:
-0.15%
HYDW:
-0.21%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKHY achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than HYDW's 0.86% return.
BKHY
1.01%
1.63%
4.89%
9.67%
N/A
N/A
HYDW
0.86%
1.40%
2.91%
6.59%
3.05%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BKHY vs. HYDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKHY has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than HYDW's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BKHY vs. HYDW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BKHY
HYDW
BKHY vs. HYDW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BKHY vs. HYDW - Dividend Comparison
BKHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than HYDW's 5.31% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKHY BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF | 7.27% | 7.35% | 8.67% | 6.59% | 6.78% | 4.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 5.31% | 5.35% | 5.69% | 4.78% | 3.30% | 4.46% | 4.56% | 4.42% |
Drawdowns
BKHY vs. HYDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKHY drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum HYDW drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKHY and HYDW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BKHY vs. HYDW - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) has a higher volatility of 1.66% compared to Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) at 1.44%. This indicates that BKHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.