PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKHY vs. BKLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKHY vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKHY achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than BKLC's 10.93% return.


BKHY

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.73%
6M
1.94%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
8.83%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*

BKLC

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.93%
6M
10.81%
1Y
28.05%
3Y*
23.25%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKHY vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKHY
BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF
1.73%8.48%8.37%12.40%-10.97%4.75%17.83%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
10.93%18.06%25.56%30.88%-20.52%27.41%36.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BKHY and BKLC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020

0.70

The correlation between BKHY and BKLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKHY vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKHY
BKHY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BKHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BKHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKHY vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKHYBKLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.10

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.31

14.15

-0.83

BKHY vs. BKLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the BKLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKHY and BKLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKHYBKLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.33

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.84

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

1.12

-0.23

Drawdowns

BKHY vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKHY drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum BKLC drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKHY and BKLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKHYBKLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.89%

-26.14%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.53%

-9.10%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.87%

-19.05%

+14.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.89%

-26.14%

+10.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.74%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.97%

-5.27%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

1.99%

-1.44%

Volatility

BKHY vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) is 1.12%, while BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that BKHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKHYBKLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

3.00%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

9.12%

-6.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

12.11%

-8.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.58%

17.16%

-9.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.37%

17.44%

-10.07%

BKHY vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKHY has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKHY vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison

BKHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than BKLC's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKHY
BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF
7.46%7.33%7.34%8.67%6.59%6.78%4.65%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.01%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKHY and BKLC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKLC has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to BKHY (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKHY dropped -15.89% vs BKLC's -26.14%.

On 5-year performance, BKLC leads with 14.33% vs 4.17% for BKHY. On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, BKHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKLC has performed better with a 14.33% return vs 4.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for BKHY.

BKHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.46%, compared with 1.01% for BKLC.

BKHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BKLC is Large Cap Growth Equities. BKHY tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index, while BKLC tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for BKHY and 0.00% for BKLC.

BKLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKHY and BKLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer