BKH vs. GWW
BKH (Black Hills Corporation) and GWW (W.W. Grainger, Inc.) are both stocks. BKH operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities), while GWW operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, BKH returned 4.90%/yr vs 22.21%/yr for GWW. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BKH vs. GWW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKH achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than GWW's 37.52% return. Over the past 10 years, BKH has underperformed GWW with an annualized return of 4.90%, while GWW has yielded a comparatively higher 22.21% annualized return.
BKH
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- 6M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 1Y
- 28.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.89%
GWW
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- 6M
- 28.49%
- YTD
- 37.52%
- 1Y
- 34.12%
- 3Y*
- 25.05%
- 5Y*
- 26.76%
- 10Y*
- 22.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $45.52M | $54.01M | $68.22M | |
| $387.12M | $359.88M | $405.44M |
BKH vs. GWW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKH Black Hills Corporation | 4.55% | 23.93% | 13.57% | -19.95% | 3.08% | 18.86% | -19.05% | 28.60% | 7.98% | 0.81% |
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 37.52% | -3.41% | 28.21% | 50.53% | 8.75% | 28.80% | 22.85% | 22.25% | 21.69% | 4.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKH and GWW is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.24 |
The correlation between BKH and GWW shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BKH:
$5.42B
GWW:
$65.26B
BKH:
$2.08
GWW:
$37.36
BKH:
34.24
GWW:
37.00
BKH:
20.43
GWW:
2.14
BKH:
2.33
GWW:
3.59
BKH:
$2.29B
GWW:
$18.38B
BKH:
$596.90M
GWW:
$7.20B
BKH:
$554.70M
GWW:
$2.82B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKH vs. GWW — Risk / Return Rank
BKH
GWW
BKH vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Hills Corporation (BKH) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKH | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 2.57 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.72 | 6.73 | +0.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKH vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKH drawdown since its inception was -65.72%, which is greater than GWW's maximum drawdown of -56.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKH and GWW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKH | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.72% | -56.73% | -8.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.94% | -13.35% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.28% | -24.50% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.98% | -24.50% | -12.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.45% | -41.60% | +1.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.43% | -1.41% | -5.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.15% | -10.98% | -5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 5.68% | -2.01% |
Volatility
BKH vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison
Black Hills Corporation (BKH) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) have volatilities of 6.15% and 6.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKH | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 6.07% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.00% | 18.19% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.61% | 25.43% | -2.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 24.72% | -2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.59% | 28.53% | -2.94% |
Dividends
BKH vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison
BKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than GWW's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKH Black Hills Corporation | 3.87% | 3.90% | 4.44% | 4.63% | 3.43% | 3.25% | 3.53% | 2.61% | 3.07% | 3.01% | 2.74% | 3.49% |
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.76% | 0.88% | 1.22% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 2.27% |
Financials
BKH vs. GWW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Black Hills Corporation and W.W. Grainger, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BKH vs. GWW - Profitability Comparison
BKH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Black Hills Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 780.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GWW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.
BKH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Black Hills Corporation reported an operating income of 201.90M and revenue of 780.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.9%.
GWW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.
BKH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Black Hills Corporation reported a net income of -2.10M and revenue of 780.70M, resulting in a net margin of -0.3%.
GWW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BKH and GWW have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKH has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to GWW (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKH dropped -65.72% vs GWW's -56.73%.
GWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKH and GWW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer