BKH vs. BIP-UN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Black Hills Corporation (BKH) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BKH or BIP-UN.TO.
Key characteristics
| BKH | BIP-UN.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.09% | -6.73% |
| 1Y Return | -9.07% | -17.01% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.11% | -1.17% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -2.13% | 3.92% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.93% | 11.07% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.37 | -0.41 |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.24% | 34.13% |
| Max Drawdown | -65.73% | -99.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -24.55% | -99.90% |
Fundamentals
| BKH | BIP-UN.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.68B | CA$17.12B |
| EPS | $3.91 | CA$0.19 |
| PE Ratio | 13.77 | 195.21 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.61 | 0.00 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.33B | CA$17.93B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $772.84M | CA$3.92B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $725.10M | CA$6.79B |
Correlation
The correlation between BKH and BIP-UN.TO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BKH vs. BIP-UN.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BKH achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly higher than BIP-UN.TO's -6.73% return. Over the past 10 years, BKH has underperformed BIP-UN.TO with an annualized return of 2.93%, while BIP-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.07% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BKH vs. BIP-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Hills Corporation (BKH) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BKH vs. BIP-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison
BKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than BIP-UN.TO's 3.99% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKH Black Hills Corporation | 4.51% | 4.63% | 3.43% | 3.25% | 3.53% | 2.61% | 3.07% | 3.01% | 2.74% | 3.49% | 2.94% | 2.89% |
BIP-UN.TO Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P | 3.99% | 3.66% | 3.43% | 2.65% | 3.16% | 3.10% | 3.99% | 3.09% | 3.44% | 4.05% | 3.95% | 4.13% |
Drawdowns
BKH vs. BIP-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKH drawdown since its inception was -65.73%, smaller than the maximum BIP-UN.TO drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKH and BIP-UN.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BKH vs. BIP-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Black Hills Corporation (BKH) is 6.41%, while Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) has a volatility of 11.41%. This indicates that BKH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIP-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BKH vs. BIP-UN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Black Hills Corporation and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities