PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKFI vs. XOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKFI vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BKFI

1D
-0.34%
1M
-1.30%
6M
-1.20%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

XOMO

1D
-1.31%
1M
10.95%
6M
6.18%
YTD
20.26%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$291.85K$607.01K$1.20M
$613.93K$674.71K$709.58K

BKFI vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BKFI and XOMO is -0.43, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026

-0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKFI vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKFI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKFI vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKFIXOMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

BKFI vs. XOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKFI vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKFI drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum XOMO drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKFI and XOMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKFIXOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-18.90%

+15.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.69%

-7.57%

+4.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.35%

-7.50%

+6.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.90%

Volatility

BKFI vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKFIXOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18%

20.68%

-16.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.18%

19.20%

-15.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.18%

19.20%

-15.02%

BKFI vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKFI vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

BKFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than XOMO's 37.04% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BKFI
BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF
2.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
37.04%31.64%26.94%5.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKFI and XOMO have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BKFI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BKFI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.

XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 37.04%, compared with 2.17% for BKFI.

BKFI is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while XOMO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BKFI and 1.01% for XOMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKFI and XOMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer