BKFI vs. BKCI
BKFI (BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF) and BKCI (BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKFI is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BKCI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. Both are actively managed. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BKFI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BKCI.
Performance
BKFI vs. BKCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKFI
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BKCI
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 3.87%
- 1Y
- 9.92%
- 3Y*
- 5.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $468.86K | $329.98K | $366.55K | |
| $291.85K | $607.01K | $1.20M |
BKFI vs. BKCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | -1.23% |
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKFI and BKCI is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKFI vs. BKCI — Risk / Return Rank
BKFI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BKCI
BKFI vs. BKCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKFI | BKCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.79 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKFI vs. BKCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKFI drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum BKCI drawdown of -31.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKFI and BKCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKFI | BKCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -31.03% | +27.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -1.32% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.35% | -9.13% | +7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.29% | — |
Volatility
BKFI vs. BKCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKFI | BKCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.18% | 14.51% | -10.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.18% | 16.52% | -12.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.18% | 16.52% | -12.34% |
BKFI vs. BKCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BKCI's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKFI vs. BKCI - Dividend Comparison
BKFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than BKCI's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF | 1.34% | 1.39% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.46% |
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKFI and BKCI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKFI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKFI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BKCI.
BKFI has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.34% for BKCI.
BKFI is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while BKCI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BKFI and 0.80% for BKCI.
Find the right allocation for BKFI and BKCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer