BKCI vs. IPOS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BKCI (BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BKCI is actively managed, while IPOS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKCI returned 4.50%/yr vs 20.01%/yr for IPOS. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.80% expense ratio.

Performance

BKCI vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCI achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 48.14% return.

BKCI

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -0.65%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 1.50%
• 1Y: 6.30%
• 3Y*: 4.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPOS

• 1D: -4.56%
• 1M: 15.69%
• YTD: 48.14%
• 6M: 46.95%
• 1Y: 76.08%
• 3Y*: 20.01%
• 5Y*: -6.66%
• 10Y*: 4.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCI vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF	1.88%	9.94%	-2.44%	20.27%	-20.26%	0.38%
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	48.14%	39.93%	-12.34%	-16.49%	-33.46%	-5.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCI and IPOS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021	0.64

The correlation between BKCI and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKCI vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKCI	IPOS
Healthcare	20.4%	14.9%
Consumer Cyclical	14.1%	6.3%
Basic Materials	11.6%	3.8%
Industrials	9.9%	13.4%
Technology	7.7%	50.2%
Financial Services	5.2%	7.3%
Energy	5.0%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	4.2%
Real Estate	3.0%	-
Communication Services	2.5%	0.3%
Utilities	-	3.1%

Return for Risk

BKCI vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCI

BKCI Risk / Return Rank: 15
BKCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
BKCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
BKCI Omega Ratio Rank: 14
BKCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
BKCI Martin Ratio Rank: 17

IPOS

IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 77
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCI vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKCI	IPOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	2.36	-1.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	2.88	-2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.42	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.56	4.46	-3.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.76	13.34	-11.57

BKCI vs. IPOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the IPOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCI and IPOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKCI vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCI drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCI and IPOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCI	IPOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.03%	-73.09%	+42.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.30%	-17.17%	+5.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.02%	-34.08%	+14.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-69.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	-37.05%	+34.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.31%	-32.02%	+22.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	5.72%	-2.14%

Volatility

BKCI vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) is 4.25%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 15.81%. This indicates that BKCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKCI	IPOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.25%	15.81%	-11.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.70%	29.95%	-18.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.58%	32.50%	-17.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.62%	27.95%	-11.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.62%	24.41%	-7.79%

BKCI vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BKCI and IPOS have an expense ratio of 0.80%.

Dividends

BKCI vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

BKCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than IPOS's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF	1.36%	1.39%	0.78%	0.73%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	0.32%	1.04%	0.93%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.25%	0.89%	1.12%	0.87%	1.73%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCI and IPOS in my portfolio?

BKCI and IPOS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKCI or IPOS?

IPOS has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to BKCI (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCI dropped -31.03% vs IPOS's -73.09%.

Which ETF is better, BKCI or IPOS?

On 3-year performance, IPOS leads with 20.01% vs 4.50% for BKCI. Both ETFs have the same 0.80% expense ratio. On volatility, BKCI has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKCI or IPOS?

Over the 3-year period, IPOS has performed better with a 20.01% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCI or IPOS?

BKCI and IPOS have the same expense ratio: 0.80% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKCI or IPOS?

BKCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.32% for IPOS.

What is the main difference between BKCI and IPOS?

They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Renaissance Capital.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.