BIZD vs. XLF

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - BIZD tracks the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index while XLF tracks the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BIZD returned 7.59%/yr vs 13.45%/yr for XLF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BIZD charges 12.86%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.

Performance

BIZD vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a -4.99% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 3.61% return. Over the past 10 years, BIZD has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 7.59%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.45% annualized return.

BIZD

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: 5.06%
• 6M: -7.28%
• YTD: -4.99%
• 1Y: -15.35%
• 3Y*: 4.27%
• 5Y*: 5.23%
• 10Y*: 7.59%

XLF

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 4.45%
• 6M: 4.24%
• YTD: 3.61%
• 1Y: 8.80%
• 3Y*: 19.04%
• 5Y*: 11.18%
• 10Y*: 13.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIZD vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF	-4.99%	-4.96%	15.63%	27.02%	-8.51%	36.25%	-7.12%	30.87%	-6.88%	0.36%
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	3.61%	14.90%	30.56%	12.03%	-10.59%	34.80%	-1.74%	31.88%	-13.06%	22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BIZD and XLF is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2013	0.58

The correlation between BIZD and XLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BIZD vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BIZD	XLF
Financial Services	100.0%	98.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BIZD vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIZD

BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 3
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

XLF

XLF Risk / Return Rank: 20
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 20
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIZD vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BIZD	XLF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.82	0.60	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.10	0.91	-2.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.11	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	0.60	-1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	1.52	-2.64

BIZD vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIZD Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIZD and XLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BIZD vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and XLF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIZD	XLF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.44%	-82.69%	+27.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.89%	-14.79%	-7.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.56%	-15.54%	-7.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.91%	-25.81%	+2.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.44%	-42.86%	-12.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.73%	-0.86%	-14.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.82%	-19.95%	+13.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.04%	5.81%	+8.23%

Volatility

BIZD vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.10%. This indicates that BIZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIZD	XLF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	4.10%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.00%	11.28%	+3.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.74%	14.65%	+4.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.49%	18.52%	-1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.78%	22.07%	-0.29%

BIZD vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIZD has a 12.86% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIZD vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.98%, more than XLF's 1.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF	11.98%	11.78%	10.94%	10.96%	11.21%	8.14%	10.39%	9.13%	10.88%	9.13%	8.51%	9.12%
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.44%	1.31%	1.42%	1.71%	2.04%	1.63%	2.03%	1.87%	2.08%	1.48%	21.10%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIZD and XLF in my portfolio?

BIZD and XLF have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIZD or XLF?

BIZD has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to XLF (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIZD dropped -55.44% vs XLF's -82.69%.

Which ETF is better, BIZD or XLF?

On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 13.45% vs 7.59% for BIZD. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BIZD or XLF?

Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BIZD or XLF?

XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BIZD or XLF?

BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 11.98%, compared with 1.44% for XLF.

What is the main difference between BIZD and XLF?

BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 12.86% for BIZD and 0.08% for XLF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.