PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIZD vs. PBDCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIZD vs. PBDCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a -8.99% return, which is significantly lower than PBDCX's 0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, BIZD has outperformed PBDCX with an annualized return of 7.77%, while PBDCX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.


BIZD

1D
-2.28%
1M
-6.62%
YTD
-8.99%
6M
-10.20%
1Y
-12.94%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
7.77%

PBDCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.77%
YTD
0.03%
6M
-0.19%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
4.45%
5Y*
-0.46%
10Y*
1.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIZD vs. PBDCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
-8.99%-4.96%15.63%27.02%-8.51%36.25%-7.12%30.87%-6.88%0.36%
PBDCX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C
0.03%7.27%2.10%6.82%-17.38%-2.01%6.29%13.44%-3.12%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BIZD and PBDCX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013

0.06

The correlation between BIZD and PBDCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIZD vs. PBDCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

PBDCX
PBDCX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PBDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIZD vs. PBDCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIZDPBDCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.21

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

1.36

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

4.27

-5.30

BIZD vs. PBDCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIZD Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the PBDCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIZD and PBDCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIZDPBDCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

1.17

-1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

-0.07

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.30

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.73

-0.43

Drawdowns

BIZD vs. PBDCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, which is greater than PBDCX's maximum drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and PBDCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIZDPBDCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.44%

-23.73%

-31.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.22%

-3.98%

-18.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

-6.87%

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-23.70%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.44%

-23.73%

-31.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.27%

-5.25%

-14.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-4.01%

-2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.63%

1.26%

+11.37%

Volatility

BIZD vs. PBDCX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) at 1.64%. This indicates that BIZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBDCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIZDPBDCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

1.64%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

3.57%

+11.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.11%

4.63%

+13.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

6.36%

+11.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

5.74%

+16.00%

BIZD vs. PBDCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIZD has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than PBDCX's 2.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIZD vs. PBDCX - Dividend Comparison

BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.87%, more than PBDCX's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
13.87%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
PBDCX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C
3.70%3.55%3.21%2.45%2.46%3.48%2.69%2.82%3.04%3.33%2.76%5.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIZD and PBDCX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIZD has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to PBDCX (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIZD dropped -55.44% vs PBDCX's -23.73%.

PBDCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIZD and PBDCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer