PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBDCX vs. BKLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBDCX vs. BKLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBDCX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than BKLN's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, PBDCX has underperformed BKLN with an annualized return of 1.72%, while BKLN has yielded a comparatively higher 4.26% annualized return.


PBDCX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.02%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
4.45%
5Y*
-0.52%
10Y*
1.72%

BKLN

1D
0.00%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.21%
6M
1.23%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
7.65%
5Y*
5.15%
10Y*
4.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBDCX vs. BKLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBDCX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C
0.03%7.27%2.10%6.82%-17.38%-2.01%6.29%13.44%-3.12%6.73%
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
0.21%6.88%8.21%12.53%-2.51%2.32%1.32%10.03%-1.32%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PBDCX and BKLN is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2011

0.10

The correlation between PBDCX and BKLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBDCX vs. BKLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBDCX
PBDCX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
PBDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBDCX vs. BKLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBDCXBKLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.80

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

2.67

-1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.42

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

1.61

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.72

6.36

-1.64

PBDCX vs. BKLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBDCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the BKLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBDCX and BKLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBDCXBKLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.80

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

1.16

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.67

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.64

+0.09

Drawdowns

PBDCX vs. BKLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBDCX drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, roughly equal to the maximum BKLN drawdown of -24.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDCX and BKLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDCXBKLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

-24.17%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.98%

-3.07%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.87%

-3.55%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.70%

-7.31%

-16.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.73%

-24.17%

+0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.25%

-0.24%

-5.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-1.09%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

0.78%

+0.48%

Volatility

PBDCX vs. BKLN - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) at 0.45%. This indicates that PBDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBDCXBKLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

0.45%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.58%

2.53%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.64%

2.75%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

4.47%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.75%

6.43%

-0.68%

PBDCX vs. BKLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBDCX has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLN's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBDCX vs. BKLN - Dividend Comparison

PBDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than BKLN's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
6.61%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%
PBDCX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C
3.70%3.55%3.21%2.45%2.46%3.48%2.69%2.82%3.04%3.33%2.76%5.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBDCX and BKLN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBDCX has higher volatility (1.64%) compared to BKLN (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBDCX dropped -23.73% vs BKLN's -24.17%.

BKLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBDCX and BKLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer