PBDCX vs. SPY
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).
PBDCX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Sep 3, 2004. SPY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 1993.
Performance
PBDCX vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PBDCX vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBDCX PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C | -1.80% | 7.27% | 2.10% | 6.82% | -17.38% | -2.01% | 6.29% | 13.44% | -3.12% | 6.73% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | -4.37% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBDCX achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's -4.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PBDCX has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 1.75%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.
PBDCX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -3.44%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 6M
- -1.12%
- 1Y
- 2.59%
- 3Y*
- 3.54%
- 5Y*
- -0.52%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
SPY
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -1.82%
- 1Y
- 17.59%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PBDCX vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBDCX has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PBDCX vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
PBDCX
SPY
PBDCX vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBDCX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 0.93 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | 1.45 | -0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.22 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 1.53 | -0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 7.30 | -4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBDCX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.93 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.69 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.78 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.56 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between PBDCX and SPY is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
PBDCX vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
PBDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than SPY's 1.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBDCX PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C | 3.39% | 3.55% | 3.21% | 2.45% | 2.46% | 3.48% | 2.69% | 2.82% | 3.04% | 3.33% | 2.76% | 5.47% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.14% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
PBDCX vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBDCX drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDCX and SPY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBDCX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.73% | -55.19% | +31.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.98% | -12.05% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.70% | -24.50% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.73% | -33.72% | +9.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.98% | -6.24% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -9.09% | +5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 2.52% | -1.32% |
Volatility
PBDCX vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) is 2.21%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that PBDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBDCX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 5.31% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 9.47% | -6.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.08% | 19.05% | -13.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.32% | 17.06% | -10.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.72% | 17.92% | -12.20% |