PortfoliosLab logo
PBDCX vs. UTF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PBDCX and UTF is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: -0.1

Performance

PBDCX vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
122.06%
635.72%
PBDCX
UTF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PBDCX:

1.42

UTF:

1.09

Sortino Ratio

PBDCX:

2.08

UTF:

1.47

Omega Ratio

PBDCX:

1.25

UTF:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

PBDCX:

0.52

UTF:

1.48

Martin Ratio

PBDCX:

3.97

UTF:

4.24

Ulcer Index

PBDCX:

2.00%

UTF:

4.18%

Daily Std Dev

PBDCX:

5.59%

UTF:

16.32%

Max Drawdown

PBDCX:

-23.31%

UTF:

-72.62%

Current Drawdown

PBDCX:

-8.76%

UTF:

-1.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBDCX achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PBDCX has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 1.58%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.51% annualized return.


PBDCX

YTD

2.45%

1M

0.29%

6M

1.87%

1Y

7.30%

5Y*

-0.19%

10Y*

1.58%

UTF

YTD

8.37%

1M

0.88%

6M

4.69%

1Y

18.68%

5Y*

11.92%

10Y*

9.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PBDCX vs. UTF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBDCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PBDCX is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PBDCX is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PBDCX is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PBDCX is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PBDCX is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PBDCX is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

UTF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UTF is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UTF is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UTF is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UTF is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UTF is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UTF is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PBDCX vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for PBDCX, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
PBDCX: 1.42
UTF: 1.09
The chart of Sortino ratio for PBDCX, currently valued at 2.08, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
PBDCX: 2.08
UTF: 1.47
The chart of Omega ratio for PBDCX, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
PBDCX: 1.25
UTF: 1.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for PBDCX, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
PBDCX: 0.52
UTF: 1.48
The chart of Martin ratio for PBDCX, currently valued at 3.97, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.00
PBDCX: 3.97
UTF: 4.24

The current PBDCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBDCX and UTF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.42
1.09
PBDCX
UTF

Dividends

PBDCX vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

PBDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than UTF's 7.33% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PBDCX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C
3.30%3.21%2.71%3.17%3.33%2.67%2.82%3.04%3.33%2.77%5.47%4.32%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
7.33%7.74%8.76%7.75%6.53%7.20%7.10%10.12%7.37%10.51%8.39%6.51%

Drawdowns

PBDCX vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBDCX drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDCX and UTF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-8.76%
-1.30%
PBDCX
UTF

Volatility

PBDCX vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) is 2.56%, while Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that PBDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.56%
10.57%
PBDCX
UTF