PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBDCX vs. UTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PBDCX vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PBDCX vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBDCX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C
-1.80%7.27%2.10%6.82%-17.38%-2.01%6.29%13.44%-3.12%6.73%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
9.32%9.93%22.37%-3.83%-9.60%17.91%6.93%42.74%-9.87%34.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBDCX achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PBDCX has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 1.75%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.34% annualized return.


PBDCX

1D
0.56%
1M
-3.44%
YTD
-1.80%
6M
-1.12%
1Y
2.59%
3Y*
3.54%
5Y*
-0.52%
10Y*
1.75%

UTF

1D
1.41%
1M
-3.86%
YTD
9.32%
6M
8.34%
1Y
10.91%
3Y*
10.92%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
11.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBDCX vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBDCX
PBDCX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PBDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

UTF
UTF Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBDCX vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBDCXUTFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

0.70

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.87

0.97

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.14

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

0.99

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.88

2.24

+0.63

PBDCX vs. UTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBDCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBDCX and UTF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBDCXUTFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.70

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.34

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.49

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.44

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between PBDCX and UTF is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PBDCX vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

PBDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than UTF's 7.13% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBDCX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C
3.39%3.55%3.21%2.45%2.46%3.48%2.69%2.82%3.04%3.33%2.76%5.47%
UTF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc
7.13%7.62%7.74%8.76%7.75%6.53%7.20%7.10%10.12%7.37%10.51%8.39%

Drawdowns

PBDCX vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBDCX drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDCX and UTF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDCXUTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

-72.62%

+48.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.98%

-11.99%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.70%

-30.28%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.73%

-52.53%

+28.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.98%

-4.42%

-2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-10.44%

+6.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

5.29%

-4.09%

Volatility

PBDCX vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) is 2.21%, while Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that PBDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PBDCXUTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

4.56%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

9.43%

-6.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.08%

15.70%

-10.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

18.51%

-12.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.72%

23.38%

-17.66%