BITY vs. RYLD

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. BITY is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, BITY returned -43.57% vs 24.93% for RYLD. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BITY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

BITY vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITY achieves a -26.11% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 12.29% return.

BITY

• 1D: -2.83%
• 1M: 2.10%
• 6M: -23.81%
• YTD: -26.11%
• 1Y: -43.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.39%

RYLD

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 10.16%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 1Y: 24.93%
• 3Y*: 8.04%
• 5Y*: 3.15%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	$100.16K	$157.87K	$174.55K
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	$10.07M	$9.36M	$9.08M

BITY vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	-26.11%	-7.84%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	12.29%	14.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BITY and RYLD is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.50

The correlation between BITY and RYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BITY vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BITY

BITY Risk / Return Rank: 1
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 90
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BITY vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITY	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.10	2.17	-3.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.66	3.05	-4.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.45	-0.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	3.67	-4.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	15.02	-16.43

BITY vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITY Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITY and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITY vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -50.87%, which is greater than RYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and RYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITY	RYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.87%	-41.53%	-9.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.87%	-6.29%	-44.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.63%	-0.37%	-47.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.13%	-8.65%	-14.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.54%	1.54%	+31.00%

Volatility

BITY vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a higher volatility of 9.22% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.07%. This indicates that BITY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITY	RYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.22%	2.07%	+7.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.63%	7.73%	+23.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.58%	10.67%	+30.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.00%	13.97%	+25.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.00%	17.04%	+21.96%

BITY vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITY vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.67%, more than RYLD's 11.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	37.67%	21.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.62%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITY and RYLD in my portfolio?

BITY and RYLD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITY or RYLD?

BITY has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to RYLD (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITY dropped -50.87% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

Which ETF is better, BITY or RYLD?

On 1-year performance, RYLD leads with 24.93% vs -43.57% for BITY. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITY or RYLD?

Over the 1-year period, RYLD has performed better with a 24.93% return vs -43.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITY or RYLD?

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITY or RYLD?

BITY has the higher dividend yield at 37.67%, compared with 11.62% for RYLD.

What is the main difference between BITY and RYLD?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITY and 0.60% for RYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.