BITK vs. RYLD
BITK (Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. BITK is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BITK charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.
Performance
BITK vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITK achieves a -30.37% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 12.29% return.
BITK
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- 6M
- -25.97%
- YTD
- -30.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RYLD
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 24.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $4.50K | $39.97K | |
| $10.07M | $9.36M | $9.08M |
BITK vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITK Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF | -30.37% | -27.15% |
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 12.29% | 5.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITK and RYLD is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITK vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank
BITK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RYLD
BITK vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF (BITK) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITK | RYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITK vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITK drawdown since its inception was -57.48%, which is greater than RYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITK and RYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITK | RYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.48% | -41.53% | -15.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.75% | -0.37% | -53.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -8.65% | -29.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.54% | — |
Volatility
BITK vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITK | RYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.91% | 10.67% | +36.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.91% | 13.97% | +32.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.91% | 17.04% | +29.87% |
BITK vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITK vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison
BITK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.49%, more than RYLD's 11.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITK Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF | 49.49% | 23.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 11.62% | 12.00% | 12.03% | 12.64% | 13.49% | 12.35% | 10.76% | 6.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITK and RYLD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BITK.
BITK has the higher dividend yield at 49.49%, compared with 11.62% for RYLD.
They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BITK and 0.60% for RYLD.
Find the right allocation for BITK and RYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer