PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITK vs. CORD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITK vs. CORD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF (BITK) and T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITK achieves a -29.86% return, which is significantly higher than CORD's -88.71% return.


BITK

1D
2.34%
1M
-15.53%
YTD
-29.86%
6M
-30.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CORD

1D
11.26%
1M
-24.83%
YTD
-88.71%
6M
-84.44%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITK vs. CORD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BITK and CORD is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025

-0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITK vs. CORD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF (BITK) and T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BITK vs. CORD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BITK vs. CORD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITK drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, smaller than the maximum CORD drawdown of -93.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITK and CORD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITKCORDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.28%

-93.69%

+37.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.41%

-92.63%

+39.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.91%

-58.30%

+22.39%

Volatility

BITK vs. CORD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITKCORDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.33%

185.44%

-136.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.33%

185.44%

-136.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.33%

185.44%

-136.11%

BITK vs. CORD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CORD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITK vs. CORD - Dividend Comparison

BITK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.31%, while CORD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BITK and CORD have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BITK is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BITK is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CORD.

BITK has the higher dividend yield at 47.31%, compared with 0.00% for CORD.

BITK is categorized as Derivative Income, while CORD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BITK and 1.50% for CORD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITK and CORD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer