BITB vs. RING

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

BITB (Bitwise Bitcoin ETF) and RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITB is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while RING is a Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BITB returned -39.67% vs 54.08% for RING. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BITB charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RING.

Performance

BITB vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITB achieves a -27.42% return, which is significantly lower than RING's -5.54% return.

BITB

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -19.63%
• YTD: -27.42%
• 6M: -29.61%
• 1Y: -39.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RING

• 1D: 3.20%
• 1M: -8.50%
• YTD: -5.54%
• 6M: -4.18%
• 1Y: 54.08%
• 3Y*: 44.87%
• 5Y*: 18.76%
• 10Y*: 13.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITB vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BITB Bitwise Bitcoin ETF	-27.42%	-6.47%	89.74%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	-5.54%	164.72%	23.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BITB and RING is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.17

Return for Risk

BITB vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITB

BITB Risk / Return Rank: 3
BITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BITB Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BITB Martin Ratio Rank: 2

RING

RING Risk / Return Rank: 36
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITB vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITB	RING	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	1.20	-2.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.31	1.62	-2.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.23	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	1.59	-2.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.37	4.45	-5.82

BITB vs. RING - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITB Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the RING Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITB and RING, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITB vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITB drawdown since its inception was -52.04%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITB and RING.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITB	RING	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.04%	-79.47%	+27.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.04%	-35.72%	-16.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.72%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.94%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.44%	-30.03%	-19.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.54%	-47.36%	+30.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.62%	12.74%	+16.88%

Volatility

BITB vs. RING - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) is 11.94%, while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a volatility of 16.83%. This indicates that BITB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITB	RING	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.94%	16.83%	-4.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.40%	39.11%	-4.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.98%	47.31%	-3.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.04%	36.81%	+13.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.04%	36.70%	+13.34%

BITB vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITB vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

BITB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BITB Bitwise Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	0.89%	0.84%	1.43%	2.01%	2.29%	2.38%	0.83%	0.83%	0.70%	0.42%	1.41%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITB and RING in my portfolio?

BITB and RING have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITB or RING?

RING has higher volatility (16.83%) compared to BITB (11.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITB dropped -52.04% vs RING's -79.47%.

Which ETF is better, BITB or RING?

On 1-year performance, RING leads with 54.08% vs -39.67% for BITB. On fees, BITB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BITB has been the lower-risk option at 11.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITB or RING?

Over the 1-year period, RING has performed better with a 54.08% return vs -39.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITB or RING?

BITB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RING.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITB or RING?

RING has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for BITB.

What is the main difference between BITB and RING?

BITB is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RING is Gold. BITB tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while RING tracks MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BITB and 0.39% for RING.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RING currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.